Legally Blind Justice Podcast

Navigating K-12 Discipline: What Parents Need to Know: Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 39

Keywords: K-12, discipline, student rights, school suspensions, due process, education law, advocacy, special education, school policies, parent rights, legal protections
 
Summary: This episode of the Legally Blind Justice podcast delves into K-12 discipline, focusing on the rights of parents and students, the historical context of school discipline, types of disciplinary actions, and the importance of due process. The discussion includes insights from legal experts on navigating school policies, advocating for students, and understanding the implications of disciplinary actions on future educational opportunities.
 
Takeaways
Parents must understand their rights regarding school discipline.
Schools often have legal teams that parents should be aware of.
Due process is a fundamental right for students facing discipline.
Historical cases shape current student rights in schools.
Different types of disciplinary actions include suspensions and expulsions.
Students with disabilities have additional protections under IDEA.
Parents should document all communications with schools regarding discipline.
Advocacy is crucial for navigating school disciplinary processes.
Understanding school policies can help in advocating for students.
Disciplinary actions can affect a student's future educational opportunities.
www.kaltmanlaw.com
 

Navigating Special Education Advocacy: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 38

Keywords: special education, disability rights, IDEA, Section 504, advocacy, school discipline, legal protections, manifestation determination reviews, educational law, parent rights
Summary
This conversation delves into the complexities of special education advocacy, focusing on the legal frameworks that protect students with disabilities, the differences between IDEA and Section 504, and the importance of proper disciplinary procedures. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by students with disabilities in school settings, the role of parents in advocating for their rights, and the impact of significant court cases on educational policies. Additionally, the conversation addresses the future of special education protections amidst potential changes in federal oversight.
Takeaways
Students with disabilities face disproportionately high rates of discipline.
IDEA ensures a free and appropriate public education for students with disabilities.
Section 504 provides protections against discrimination for all students with disabilities.
Legal action should be a last resort; creative solutions are preferred.
MDRs are required for disciplinary actions exceeding 10 days.
Parents must be involved in the MDR process and ask critical questions.
Schools must follow procedural safeguards before disciplining students with disabilities.
Goss vs. Lopez established due process rights for all students.
Honig vs. Doe reinforced the need for proper evaluations before disciplinary actions.
The future of special education protections may be uncertain with potential changes to the Department of Education.
www.kaltmanlaw.com 
Transcript: The transcript is autogenerated and may contain transcription errors.
Tim Markley (00:21)
Welcome to the Legally Blind Justice podcast. I'm your host, Tim Marfleet. And in this episode, we're going to discuss special education discipline and due process issues. with Taylor Ruiz, who heads up the special education team at K. Altman Law, and Keith Altman, who is the founder of K. Altman Law.
Tim Markley (00:40)
Today
we'll be covering legal considerations, best practices, as well as practical advice for schools, parents, advocates, and anyone in the special education realm. Let's get started.
The agenda for today, we're going to discuss why this matters. For example, why are these laws important in the special education space? Why is it important to advocate for students with disabilities in terms of discipline and why do we discipline students with disabilities differently than their neurotypical peers. Then we're going to get into the legal framework of IDEA and Section 504. After that, we'll discuss MDRs, which are called Manifestation Determination Reviews. Then we will get into procedural safeguards and parents' rights. And then just some feedback and commentary on some special case laws that shape discipline for students with disabilities. And then lastly, we'll discuss how K-Outman can help. So getting into why this matters. It's truly important to understand the relationship between disability and discipline in schools. But why does it actually matter? Students with disabilities, they face a disproportionately high rate of school discipline when compared to their non-disabled peers. Schools have to balance discipline with the federal protections under the IDEA and Section 504 guidelines. Certain missteps in disciplining students with disabilities could lead to lawsuits, due process hearings, and violations of student rights. Now, Keith, let's start with a big question. Are you ready? Sure, let's go. Okay.
Why are students with disabilities more likely to face disciplinary actions in schools?
Well, as a general proposition, many of the common disabilities that students face, and for example, ADHD is incredibly common, is their way of processing the world around them, or autism is an even bigger problem. Their way of processing the world around them is different than other students. They tend to not understand social cues. They tend to be impulsive.
In nature, they tend not to appreciate the consequences of their actions in the same way that other students that other students may do that. In addition, some of them are less are developmentally challenged and are less sophisticated than the other children around them. They are easily manipulated, shall we say, and can be prompted to engage in behavior and conduct that is not appropriate.
And so it is generally true that these students, they've got a tough enough time getting through the day and then you throw trying to conduct themselves on top of that makes for a very, very difficult time. Absolutely. I agree. And you know what, in a lot of research that I've done, the data shows a trend that these students typically struggle with behavioral expectations due to their disabilities.
In the vast majority of cases that I've seen and that I've been involved in, a lot of times schools don't have access to the proper interventions that these students need in place. So in my mind, that can lead to more unfair disciplinary actions. So it's not just about student behavior, but also about how the schools respond to the behavior. So let's talk about the legal protections that should be in place to prevent these issues, which leads me into IDEA, which is the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. This act protects students with IEPs, which are also known as individualized education plans, to ensure a free and appropriate public education or FAPE to ensure that that happens. Okay, Section 504 prohibits discrimination, and it applies to students with disabilities, even if they don't have an IEP in place. You know, a student who as a temporary disability, maybe something like a broken leg could get a 504 plan. That was something new and interesting that I'd Procedural safeguards, school districts and IEP teams or 504 teams always provide parents with the procedural safeguards at the meeting. And then you, a lot of times will sign for those procedural safeguards. One thing that I've noticed is that a lot of times they're not gone over in depth. And unless you have a law degree or a special ed degree, it's kind of hard to navigate that, right? But those procedural safeguards are in place and schools must follow them before disciplining students with disabilities. In addition to that, you can always look at the school districts discipline matrices on their website. You can also look at their policy for disciplining students with disabilities.
Those will help you navigate the process. In terms of procedural safeguards, those safeguards are put in place to outline what the process should be. But the details are kind of decided by the specific school district. They just must meet IDEA or Section 504 standards at the minimum.
So I do have a question for you, Keith. Just about IDEA and Section 504, I've been in education for quite some time and you've been in the legal field also in education, but everybody sees it a little bit differently. In your mind, what do you think the difference is between IDEA and Section 504? Well, I think the key difference really relates to the school's responsibility with respect to the student. Under IDEA, one of the key aspects is that the school must be on the lookout for children who are having difficulties and who may be at risk of not getting a FAPE education. And 504 is a little bit different. It's meant to be more students who need just some assistance with the peripheries of trying to get their education. As you said, a student who breaks a leg who needs some assistance or a student that is in a wheelchair, it doesn't really affect their education per se, but they need to be able to get around to their classes. They need some additional time. In terms of, you know, I look at it kind of simplified with an IEP and IDEA, the school has a lot of burden that it must follow in terms of being able to ensure that students receive the education. a 504, the burden's more on the parents to ask for things that they need. Now, clearly, and I'm sure that you'll go over them, clearly there are very specific differences between the two. And I know that you're putting up the grid, at least I think you are, because as some of you may or may not know, I am...essentially blind. lost my vision a few years ago, so I can feel for what many of these students are going through and unfortunately I can't read that screen. But why don't you take them through the essential differences because I think that there are finer points to it. But I will say in the end, this is about kids. It's not about adults. It's not about laws.
It's about we have a kid here who needs some help. How do we get them the help that they need? And how do we help protect their day to day involvement in an educational institution? That's really what it's at. I try to focus on that at all times and not get so wrapped up in the words. Absolutely, and just to kind of reiterate your your point here, IDA applies specifically to students with an IEP, right?
That's correct. then you've got Section 504 is kind of like more broad and it was designed to prevent discrimination based on disability, even for those students without an IEP. So I think the way you explained it was really great because I even got a little bit more insight on Section 504 as it relates to IDEA. So to me, that means that schools have to be mindful of both laws
IDEA and 504 when handling discipline. You know, what happens when they don't follow these proper procedures? Like what is what is a school's responsibility? You know, is that when the parents take legal action or what would the next step be at that point, Keith? Well, legal action in my mind is the absolute last stage. I say to people all the time, you want to be a graduate or a litigant. The goal is to try to find creative, productive solutions to problems. And I know that many parents may be frustrated that they don't see the school delivering what they believe their child is, and that may very well be true. I always try to take the approach, can we find a productive solution to the problem? That doesn't mean that we're afraid to litigate when necessary. We do do process hearings. I think we have four of them coming up in the next 60 days and from a bigger litigation perspective, we litigate all the time. We had two cases at the US Supreme Court, two terrorism cases. So we're not afraid to litigate when is necessary. But I think there are so much more effective solutions that can be tried. the parents are at so much of a disadvantage because the school has the expertise, they've got the resources to try to...to try to put their perspective on the situation versus the parents who may be just having significant challenges just trying to get their child into school every day. And it really is not fair. And even if the parents understand the data points that are relevant to their child, they often don't understand how do you put those data points together to accurately and effectively advocate for your child.
 
So I think it's just essential that the playing field be leveled. And there's a disturbing trend that I see, and we do our work all over the country, is that schools are very willing to throw children in the garbage these days. You know, when I was a kid, when a child had problems in school or they had difficulties, the school was invested in those kids.
 
they spent the time, whether they, you know, whether they had a disability or they didn't today, it's just, they're too much trouble. Let's push them out there. They're, let's send them to alternate school. Let's do everything we can other than do what we're supposed to do, which is educate our kids. So these, these procedural protections, they are essential to try to level the playing field, to give these kids a chance to help them.
 
overcome and manage their disabilities. That's really what's going on here. Absolutely. I completely agree. you know, in comparing IDEA and Section 504, you know, it's best to look at the features of each law when you're comparing. So the purpose of IDEA is to provide faith, which I'd mentioned before, is a free, appropriate public education
 
in the least restrictive environment. And the least restrictive environment in terms of IDEA is relating to more time with their neurotypical or non-disabled peers in the same setting. So 504 is designed, its purpose was to prevent discrimination based on disability and it ensures equal access, right?
 
To be eligible for IDEA, you have to have an evaluation and you'd have to be identified or have a diagnosis through child find of one of 13 specific disability categories. So it is quite different. Where 504, there's a much broader definition of disability, including anything like we'd mentioned before, a broken leg.
 
that causes some substantial limitation of major life activities, where IDEA eligibility is more so not just life abilities, but academic abilities that are hindered. So that's really the main difference there. IDEA only applies to students in K-12 public schools with disabilities. 504 is for K-12 colleges, universities, and any federally funded programs.
 
So when you think about federally funded public hospitals, those hospitals are covered by Section 504 and they must comply with that. So it's very different because IEPs are just using K-12 environments. The key protections that IDEA offers are providing students with an IEP with measurable goals, where Section 504
 
requires accommodations so that students get an even playing field with their typical peers. But there are no goals associated. There's nothing measured. An educational plan, which can consist of curriculum modification, curricular accommodations, require an IEP. and a 504, you can get a 504 plan with accommodations.
 
to make access to education easier, but in terms of modifying curricular objectives and content and standards, that wouldn't be something that would happen under Section 504. That would be under an IEP. So under IDEA, there are some discipline protections, which are the MDR, Manifestation Determination Review. According to IDEA,
 
This is required for disciplinary actions that exceed 10 days, whether it be out of school or in school, that more than 10 days constitutes a change of placement. In every state, it can be a little different. We do operate in all 50 states, and these are really just the bare minimal guidelines and laws. There are some states or some school districts that
 
after the fifth consecutive day they conduct an MDR. So make sure you check your state's procedural safeguards to be able to determine what that process looks like. Under Section 504, schools should evaluate before any kind of disciplinary change of placement like alternative school, but an MDR is not always required under Section 504. IDEA, the funding is federal.
 
and the federal funds the school districts to provide additional services. Section 504 does not have any federal funding attached to it. Legal enforcement, the US Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs enforces IDEA. Section 504 is enforced by the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights or OCR.
 
Now we're going to talk a little bit about manifestation determination reviews. As mentioned, these must be conducted within 10 school days of a decision to change a placement due to discipline. Now that could be in school suspension, out of school suspension, alternative school, therapeutic placement environment. The team must actually determine if the behavior was a direct result of the student's disability.
 
or just a failure to implement the IEP. If the behavior was determined. And before you continue, very important aspect of this, is cumulative school days for the school year. So it doesn't have to all happen at once. If, for example, there, you know, a student was suspended for five days. And then the next time the student is suspended for six days, an MDR is required at that
 
And so you've got to be careful with that and make sure that they get the MDR when they're entitled to it. That's right. And if the behavior was deemed to be a manifestation of the disability, the school cannot impose standard discipline protocols. If it was not a manifestation, the school can proceed with disciplinary actions, but the child's education has to continue. So I do have another question for you, Keith. It actually comes down to
 
to MDRs and how schools often struggle with determining whether the student's behavior was caused by their disability or not. What's the legal standard here? Is it the conduct directly related to the disability? Is that the first legal standard? The first question? Well, it depends. It's not such an easy question to answer.
 
It's whether the conduct was caused or contributed to. So one of the things that the schools may try to do is try to say that it is this, you know, try to say, unless it's the sole cause of the conduct, then it's not, it's not, you know, an issue for the MDR. And that's just not true. It's caused or contributed. So for example, let's say a student was,
 
bullied or pressured by another student to take an action. And they do that. Now, it's obviously a multifactorial situation here where you have the pressure from the other student as well as our student's disability. And those two things together contributed to the conduct. That's okay. That satisfies the rules of an MDR. So you have to be
 
first you have to make that assessment. And I think one of the things that the parents often miss out on is trying to take the position, well, how did you establish, if the school's trying to, and they very often do, say, this is not a manifestation, of course not. But I always throw out to them, well, how did you make that determination that it wasn't a manifestation?
 
throw the burden back upon them. And that's the key, you know, that's the key issue. And a lot of times schools aren't prepared. They're not prepared to deal with that. And you can often, you know, put them in a difficult position where they can't show that it's not a manifestation. For example, you have a child with ADHD and the child engaged in something that, you know, is reflective of impulsive.
 
activity that once again a non-disabled child may be able to look past, but somebody with ADHD, they get wrapped up in that and they're unable to conform their conduct. So how can you say that impulsivity is not a manifestation of ADHD? I think it's very difficult to do that.
 
I agree. Yeah, I mean, it's definitely in the DSM five is one of the top five symptoms. So, you know, the other thing that I've seen too, and I know you've seen this as well, the person that's making the determination, sometimes it's not a person who may be well versed in that child's disability or may not have a medical background or even a medical license. So at that point, what could families do? Should they appeal?
 
the decision or should they do something different in that regard if that was to happen? Well, I think that, you know, first before you're even thinking about appealing, what you want to make sure of is that if an MDR is going to take place that the appropriate team is there, that they just don't have one person that they have, you know, teachers, they have the, you know, effectively the IEP team needs to be there as well as a nurse and some medical
 
professional and I think absent a medical professional in the meeting, in the meeting, corrupts the meeting right off the bat. And so I think you need to insist that the right team is there. two, I think the parents need to ensure that they are able to participate in the meeting and ask the tough questions. When you get a, you you're dealing with an ADHD student and it's an impulse
 
impulsive type situation, how, you know, and the school psychologist, let's say is there. Well, how did you determine that impulsivity is not part of ADHD? Ask them the tough questions. Now, if the procedure has been conducted fairly, even if there is a, what you believe to be an erroneous determination, you then have the ability to appeal the outcome of the MDR.
 
and that would lead to an expedited due process hearing, which effectively would have an administrative law judge or ALJ appointed who would hear the basis of the appeal and try to resolve the appeal. You might also do that if you've asked for the right people to be there or you've asked to be able to participate and that participation was denied. That's clearly also a
 
a basis for appealing the MDR. And once again, you'll be in front of an ALJ. Now, once you get in front of an ALJ though, the stakes are somewhat different in terms of the process. And that's where you start to need to be thinking very carefully as to whether you need some assistance with that kind of a process because now you're, I mean, it's not quite like being in court, but it's like being in court.
 
There's witnesses, there is evidence, there is a whole set of procedures that it may be overwhelming for the average parent to try to deal with effectively.
 
Most definitely. I really appreciate your insight. so what I'm hearing is that, if it is a manifestation of the child's behavior, is a manifestation of their disability, schools instead should adjust the student's IEP support plan, maybe conduct a functional behavioral assessment and revise the IEP if necessary, rather than just removing them from school.
 
That's absolutely true. And once again, the point here is to come up with a creative solution to the problem. an intellectual exercise for the parents and the team and everything, but we're still talking about a kid. It's to take a look at it a bit from the kid's perspective, look at what happened here and try to come up with a creative solution. How can we
 
educate the child on how what they did was inappropriate. What's the best methodology? it, you know, in this day and age, are there some, you know, a video learning module of some kind that they can watch that can help them that can help them get through that? I mean, as as an example, we had a case where a autistic child and he was moderate on the spectrum.
 
said to another student with respect to a female, and I think he was about 14, and he said to the other student, I'd like to sexually assault that girl. He didn't even understand what it meant to sexually assault somebody, but he heard somebody say it, and so he thought that was an appropriate context. Now, what do you do with a student like that? you, you know, and the, the, the non-disabled student,
 
told the educators about that and they brought a Title IX complaint, which is a sexual harassment complaint against our kid. But is that really the right answer? Or do you need to explain to the child what he said? Take the time and invest in these kids and never lose sight of the fact that even if they have disabilities, they're just as
 
As important and deserving. Of the time and effort of the teachers as any other kid out there and and they can, you know, live productive lives and is as many of you. I mean your parents have these kinds of children. It's harder, it's different, but they have the same entitlements and expectations as every other kid out there and can't lose sight of that. So what can we do to find the best solution to?
 
try to get them to conform and adjust their condom.
 
Absolutely. you know, parents, I know we started to talk about appeals on the last slide, but parents do have the right to challenge an MDR decision through an expedited due process hearing like Keith had mentioned, which is an appeal. When this happens, a stay put provision is enacted. So the student remains in their current placement until a specific resolution is found, except for in severe or special circumstances.
 
And the school must always provide written notice as well as documentation of the decisions that were made. Failure to follow these procedural safeguards can result in legal actions and the issuance of compensatory education. You know, so I have a question for you, Keith. Parents really often feel overwhelmed when their child faces these type of disciplinary actions. What rights do they have
 
under their procedural safeguards? What are their rights? Well, I think the right to an MDR is an important situation that there needs to be a rational discussion of what took place with the appropriate people involved. one of the safeguards. But aside from that, if the MDR concludes that their disability did not cause or contribute
 
to the conduct, there is a, in a public school setting, there are a number of due process rights in terms of how do they adjudicate the disciplinary proceedings, that there has to be somewhat of a quasi-hearing, an opportunity to speak with the principal or the designee about the issue.
 
that if there is a finding of responsibility, one of the things about sanctions, sanctions are supposed to have two purposes. Number one, they're supposed to, well, first, they're supposed to be the least, the least strong, probably not the right word, but that accomplishes two goals. holds reasonably accountable, and two,
 
deter us future conduct, not the most serious. So in any of these, you know, in any kind of assignment of discipline, you have to take a look at what took place, what are reasonable steps to correct that action, and then conform the sanctions to meet those deeds. So for example, a student who
 
All let's just say. Any student, whether it's a. You know someone special education needs or a non special education student. Let's just say they walked up to somebody and slap them. OK, that's a that's misconduct. You know the assessment is is what kind of a sanction would help correct. That particular conduct, it's not expulsion. You know that that's the most severe. That's a terminal sanction.
 
call, that's the most severe. It's what's the least severe that accomplishes those goals. And so they have the right to, you have the right to see that the sanction is appropriate for the conduct that took place. And if we're dealing with a special needs child, that the sanction is appropriate in the light of what their needs are in a way that can be effective. So that example I gave of the student.
 
with, know, I want to sexually assault that girl. It's to, you know, take them and explain how that's not an appropriate thing to say, how this is what you said, what it actually means, and try to explain that to them and turn these opportunities into a learning opportunity and not make it just punitive in nature. And schools often lose sight of that. And you as parents,
 
have got to stand your ground and say, how do we fix this problem? What can we do here to be productive and never lose sight of it? So from procedural safeguards, that all plays into that. Thank you so much. That was a really insightful answer. And I kind of wanted to just discuss some really important cases that I've been reading lately that really shaped
 
special education in relation to disciplining students with disabilities. know, over the years, numerous court cases have established and refined specific legal standards for disciplining students with disabilities. I find these cases to be the backbone of the discipline provisions in schools. You know, the first one that I found really interesting was Goss versus Lopez of 1975.
 
This was a US Supreme Court case. It wasn't specific to special education, but what it did was it set the stage for all student discipline by holding that students have due process rights under the 14th Amendment. The court actually ruled that public school students must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard before being suspended even for a short period, specifically for suspensions of 10 days or less.
 
The student is entitled to be told to Keith's point that what they did was wrong and given a chance to actually explain their side, at least informally. This case was important for students with disabilities too, because it really ensured basic fairness procedures in all discipline cases. Now the implication is that schools must follow due process for every suspension. For special education students, GOSS rights apply in addition to IDEA.
 
and the IDEA specific protections. You know, in terms of special education, what does GOSS mean to you, Keith, in terms of, you know, providing those due process rights under the 14th Amendment? Well, it means that, you know, our children, all children, are not just
 
in a place in the school where the school can effectively do whatever they want and that the students have no rights at all. Students do have rights. They may be limited in some respect and they do need protections and it's become more important that they have protections these days. But it just stands for the proposition that the school has got to establish.
 
that number one, a violation took place, number two, that the student engaged in the conduct, and number three, there are no extraneous circumstances that may have contributed to it. And they cannot just simply dispense with these rights. And it's fundamental. mean, it's kind of parallel to free speech.
 
And everybody has free speech. Now a student in a K through 12 environment doesn't have full free speech rights. There are limitations that would not apply to older older individuals, but they still do have free speech rights. Just like that, these kids are entitled to the can't. The school can't act in an arbitrary and capricious manner. That once again they have to use the least serious.
 
Sanctions to achieve the goals of appropriate discipline and that when a student doesn't get these rights, there is a basis. For attempting to enforce these rights. And it's just essential. There would be no schools would just simply do whatever whatever they wanted and they can't quite do that. They have a lot of control and a lot of power, but it's not unlimited. And as parents you have to understand that.
 
your children have to be provided, you know, notice and an opportunity to be heard and have to be there. There has to be a reasonable attempt at investigation and fact finding. And that the school can't just make decisions without engaging in these this process. Absolutely, and what preceded Goss was
 
Honig versus Doe. And in Honig, it was a US Supreme Court seminal case on special ed discipline. Honig involved a California student with an emotional disturbance who was suspended indefinitely for what was deemed to be aggressive behavior. The Supreme Court ruled that schools may not unilaterally exclude or expel a child with a disability for misbehavior that is
 
disability-related or a manifestation. This case truly affirmed the 10-day rule that we saw in GOSS. A suspension of more than 10 consecutive school days was deemed a change in placement, and that would require due process, which would be an MDR. You know, the court in this case emphasized IDEA's stay-put provision. At the time, was EHA. As you know, it was
 
that was the previous name prior to becoming an IDEA. The child has the right to remain in their current educational placement during any dispute. If a child's behavior is dangerous, the school's remedy is to seek a court injunction or use a 45-day interim placement rather than simply just expelling the student. Hoenig versus Doe forced Congress and states to develop procedures, which then became MDRs.
 
to balance school safety and student rights. Honeys also confirm. Go ahead. Well, I was just gonna say, I wonder if the thing that's important is, and we're actually dealing with this right now, is where the offending conduct is a direct result of the school not providing the services that they are supposed to be providing.
 
You know, it would be a little incongruous if, you know, the school doesn't give, you know, we're dealing with situation with student who's not being given the communication tools that she needs. And she gets very frustrated because she can't communicate and express her needs. And therefore, and so she becomes violent because she gets frustrated being unable to do that. And, you know, that's clearly a problem.
 
But the school is the one that created it in the first place. So they can't just create the problem, cause the reaction, and then throw the kid in the garbage because they're now in danger as they perceive. And that's why you've got to, you you really have to make sure that you identify what may be the root cause of what's going on. Most definitely. And that's why
 
you know, the US Department of Education released last November, know, guidelines for using functional behavior assessments and creating behavior intervention plans and really determining the root cause of the behavior by doing an FBA. An FBA would determine what the function of the behavior is. So without that information, it's really hard for a school to make these type of decisions.
 
But in interest of everyone's time, the other cases and case law will be sent a few days after the webinar in a handout. I would like to get into talking about what we do here at Keltman Law and how we can help. We do provide advocacy, special education advocacy for parents and students. We assist with MDR appeals, MDR disputes, due process hearings.
 
discrimination complaints, also handle mediation. Our advocates will help with IEP revisions, change of placements, et cetera.
 
We resolve disputes through negotiation or legal action when necessary. We also do policy development for schools and districts to create legally sound discipline policies and provide legal insights in special education cases.
 
So now it's time for our Q &A. The first question that I see here from Linda says, a child is being removed from the Gen Ed classroom to an alternative placement classroom.
 
When, and this happens when the child is dysregulated and they're moved there for the rest of the day. Now, do these removals constitute a change in placement? Do the days contribute to the 10 day time period needed for an MDR? You know, in my opinion, that is an absolute, you know, yes, they could because that is a change in placement, change of educational setting, right? That's something like.
 
in school suspension. But do you have a different viewpoint on that, Keith, from your legal expertise? No, I think that once the removal would get to the 11th day in the same school year, an MDR is required. Now, I would think, though, that if it appears to be the same kind of problem, I think that the problem is still somewhat different and that you need to get with the
 
school and saying, look, what's going on here? You know, why can't, what do we need to do differently to help this student maintain their presence in the gen ed class? you know, once they get to the 11th day and you do the MDR and you conclude that it's, that it is, you know, it is related to the disability that may keep them from necessarily taking them out of the class, but that doesn't solve the fundamental problem. And as I say,
 
We've got a kid. How do we take care of this kid? Forget about the laws, forget about the MDRs. We're with a kid here. My job is, although I am an attorney and I practice, I try to get at what's really going on and try to solve the problem from a different perspective. Why is the student keep running into a problem in the gen ed class? What can we do differently?
 
That's really what the issue is. But I believe that once they hit that 11th day, then MDRs are required every single time after that.
 
Absolutely. Linda also asked, you know, what legal regulation or code supports that those removals count? That would be under IDEA, as well as your state's procedural safeguards. And then she asked, how can she communicate this to the school? You know, a lot of times schools are reticent to provide
 
that information and that insight. And they automatically assume that parents don't know what they're doing or what they're talking about. I mean, I myself have a special needs child and I'm very well versed in special education and special education advocacy. And I had times where I wasn't taken seriously. So sometimes it takes an outside party to kind of step in and see the bigger picture.
 
and really hold the school accountable while working with the school simultaneously to create what's in the best interest for your child. You know, as I'd mentioned in the comment, feel free to set up a consultation. We'd be happy to assist you with this matter and to get some more details and talk more about the case specifically. And again, I'm sorry your child is going through that.
 
What are the next steps if the school refuses to reverse the suspension when found they falsely accused a child and OCR hearing? They recognize their false accusations but refuse to reverse it for record keeping purposes. However, they're pushing to transfer him out of the district without the reversal. So with that being on his record, that would be staying on his discipline record.
 
So when a school doesn't want to, you know, remove that from the record or reverse the steps, although the child was falsely accused, what can the family do, Keith? Well, you know, you have to break this down to a couple of different things. It's not unusual that a school or even in the court system that there is a wrong determination.
 
That's not the basis of an appeal or a challenge. It's was there some procedural irregularity? Now, for example, we had a situation where we had a student who's got an IEP. He did what most young men do and the, know, he's 16.
 
and he wears the same pair of pants 12 days in a row until the pants start walking on their own. On a Sunday, he had a pocket knife in his pocket, which he forgot to take out of his pocket and goes to school the next day. He's got ADHD. He takes the knife out at one point, you know, it doesn't open it, but he's fidgeting with it because it was in his pocket. And some other kid sees this and the next and reports it to the school. Well, the next day.
 
it turns out that, you know, they call him in, they search him, they search his bag, whatever. He doesn't have the knife with him because he realized he had it with him and he didn't come in with it. And then he, but they ask him and, and they're questioning him. He's a sped student without his parents. The police are there. I mean, they've made a whole big deal about this thing. And he says, yes, I had a knife in school.
 
Well, interesting. And then they moved to expel him. Well, interestingly, it turns out in this particular state and this particular school district, the school district defers to the state definition of what constitutes a weapon. And in that particular state, any knife has to be greater than two and a half inches to be considered a weapon. But they have no idea how long the knife is because he doesn't have it. And they moved to expel him anyway.
 
And so the whole thing is corrupted. You know, they make a finding that he had a weapon in school without ever having seen the weapon. And so we got involved and we're working right now to have that decision vacated. So what you can do is that if you're a peer, you know, and in that particular case, that wasn't like, we didn't like the decision that they made. There was a procedural error there. They never saw the pocket knife.
 
It's a and it's a Swiss Army knife. They never saw the pocket knife to conclude that it was a weapon by their own definition. That's a procedural error. That's something that you can latch onto. They interviewed our kid with the police without his parents and he's a sped student. That was a procedural error. Those things you can challenge a decision based upon. But you can't do it just because you didn't like their ultimate decision or a lot of these matters are decided on.
 
on, you know, on a he said, she said type basis. And the person who's making the decision gets to decide who they believe. It can't really challenge a determination based upon that. So if there is a procedural error, that's important. One of the things we always seek is to get the determination vacated, which means it wouldn't show up on there. You know, it wouldn't show up on the record. Now, sometimes you get a school that's recalcitrant.
 
that doesn't want to, you know, is unwilling to, is unwilling to give up on that. It's kind of like the, some of you may have seen happy days way back with, you know, Henry Winkler, who was the Fonz, who couldn't say the word wrong. No matter what, he just couldn't admit that he was wrong and schools are sometimes like that. And in that particular case, it can be difficult that you may have to.
 
You may have to go beyond. may have to look at the possibility of due process. You may have to look at the possibility of litigation. I don't like to go down those paths, but we do and will when we have to.
 
We have another question. How does the current undoing of the Department of Ed impact the protections that we've been discussing? know, the proposed dismantling of the US Department of Ed, it kind of does raise some concerns regarding the enforcement as well as the administration of protections for students with disabilities.
 
under IDEA as well as Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Both laws are really pivotal in my opinion and ensuring that students with disabilities receive FAPE or Free Appropriate Public Education and are still safeguarded against discrimination. You know, the current role of the Department of Ed is they play a central role in funding. They administer these IDEA grants to states and those are what actually supports special education services.
 
The federal funds are provided as well as state funds on a matrix. So there are different levels of an IEP. There's level one, which is a student who doesn't require interventions, all the way up to level five. And there's a significant difference in the amount of money that a school district is awarded depending on a child's matrix level. And the matrix level is directly guided by the supports that your child needs.
 
Some states do offer state scholarships for families or education savings accounts. Now, a lot of times when you get those, you'll see that it'll be a lower amount. So you always want to request a matrix score review just to make sure that your child's getting the funding that they would be entitled to in the public school system. DOE also provides oversight.
 
They monitor state compliance with federal mandates, and they make sure that students with disabilities receive appropriate services and an education. Also, it also does enforcement through its Office of Civil Rights and investigates complaints and ensures adherence to civil rights laws, including Section 504. You know, in my opinion, some of the potential impacts of if DOE was to actually be dismantled,
 
there would be funding disruptions. The elimination of the DOE could lead to uncertainties in the distribution of these federal funds that are designed for special ed. And alternative agencies may possibly assume this responsibility, but there's no guarantee. That transition could truly result in delays of inconsistencies and could hinder the delivery of services to these students with disabilities.
 
You know, another concern that I have would be the weekend enforcement and protections. You know, the Department of Ed's OCR is really instrumental in enforcing compliance with IDEA and Section 504, and the dissolution of it might lead to diminished federal oversight and things going straight back to the states and to the school districts to actually uphold the rights of students with disabilities. You know, it could create
 
an increased disparity in educational access as well as educational quality across different regions. You know, and if it goes back to the states without any kind of federal oversight, states would have greater autonomy and interpreting as well as implementing these special education laws. It could lead to some significant variations in the quality and or the availability of services for students. And that would
 
particularly just depend on the state priorities and the state's resources. And lastly, the challenges and policy coordination. The Department of Ed currently provides guidance and support to make sure that there's a consistent application across the country of IDEA and Section 504. Its absence could truly result in some fragmented policies, which would make it different for parents or advocates, even school administrators.
 
to navigate the system and be able to determine what students' rights are and advocate effectively for them. Based on that, Keith, did you have a different viewpoint or anything that you wanted to share or anything you wanted to add to that question? Well, do think there are, I think that some of the functions of the DOE will be assumed by other agencies. It just simply has to.
 
But from the perspective of due process and expedited due process, those go before state level administrative law judges. So that's not really going to be impacted by the existence or nonexistence of the DOE. And ultimately, these issues could and would be resolved in federal court. So I think that it may make it a little bit more inconvenient.
 
In the end, think students will, you know, looking at it at the individual student level, I think at the individual student level, students will still have their due process and procedural rights. It just may be a little bit harder to get at it. But I agree with what you're saying from a bigger picture perspective. Simply, I don't think anybody knows what's ultimately going to happen here. No, not at all. All we can do is
 
truly speculate and you know, I do when each state already does have certain control over some parts of state education, right? You know, with the implementation of school choice in various states and things of that nature. So do you feel that it would like really further complicate the system that's already complicated?
 
It may, but I'm not. I'm not a wizard in terms of being able to predict the future. And I think we're just going to have to wait. I think we're just going to have to wait and see. Unfortunately, it creates uncertainty and you know, in the end, as I said, we're dealing with kids, individual kids that need. You know our support and I look at it from their perspective. To me, whatever happens with the DOE is a bit of a sideshow.
 
and focused on how do we help this kid in this particular problem. We can't lose sight of that. Absolutely, absolutely. That is definitely the most important thing is, you know, the clients that we work with, you know, I would say our team really fights for our clients as if they're their own children. I mean, we get we get told that every day, you know, you're so passionate about what you do and they get compliments about, you know, our attorneys and how
 
much they really care. So I just wanted to say, you know, thank you for that. And for all the things that you do for our clients and our students that we work with. And we do have one last question from Carrie and it says, there a comprehensive resource you can recommend regarding assistive communication tools and policies and or procedures? So we do have a lot of resources on our website.
 
We also do post a lot of research as well as blogs. If you can't find what you're looking for, feel free to send me an email at sped, S-P-E-D, at kaltmanlaw.com and I will send something over to you. Thank you everyone so much for joining. Thanks for spending the hour with us. It's been great, Keith. Your conversation was very insightful and I...
 
Got a different perspective on the administrative proceedings. So I really appreciate you joining me and I hope everyone has a great evening. Thank you everybody. Thank you.
 
Tim Markley (58:07)
I hope you've enjoyed this special edition of the Legally Blind Justice podcast and the replay of the webinar with Taylor Ruiz and Keith Altman. Remember, if you need help or you have a question, feel free to reach out to us at 248-985-8677 or check us out on the web at kaltmanlaw.com.
 
Thank you.
 
 

Understanding Functional Behavior and Discipline: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 37

Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Understanding Functional Behavior and Discipline
Join host Tim Markley and the special education advocacy team at K Altman Law as they explore the critical role of Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs) and Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) in supporting students and promoting positive behavioral change. Featuring special guest Michelle Guffey from New Horizons Educational Group, this rebroadcast of an insightful webinar dives into the FBA process, legal rights, effective interventions, and the latest DOE guidance.
Learn how data-driven strategies can help address challenging behaviors, reduce disciplinary actions, and ensure schools provide the necessary support for all students. Whether you're a parent, educator, or advocate, this episode is packed with valuable insights to help navigate the complexities of special education and student discipline.
📌 Subscribe now and stay informed on legal and educational topics that matter! Need assistance? Visit www.kaltmanlaw.com or call 248-817-8510.
 
Transcript: The follow transcript is autogenerated and may contain transcription errors.
 
 Tim Markley (00:20)
Welcome to the Legally Blind Justice podcast. I'm your host, Tim Markley. In this episode, we're going to talk about functional behavior and its role in discipline. This will be a rebroadcast of a webinar held by our special education team in which they were joined by Michelle Guffey of the New Horizons Education Group. So sit back and enjoy the podcast.
 
Hi everyone, my name is Sarah Loteck. I'm one of the special education advocates here at K Altman Law. And today we're going to be doing a webinar on functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans. We also have a guest, Michelle Goofy. She's from New Horizons Educational Group and she's going to be joining with us and presenting as well. Today we're going to discuss functional behavior assessments and behavior intervention plans and the new DOE guidance on those. All right, Sarah, take it away.
 
Okay, so first as an introduction, today we're going to be presenting, it's going to be Taylor Ruiz, who is our Director of Special Education Advocacy here at K. Altman Law. And I already introduced myself, Loteck, I'm one of the Special Education Advocates. And then Michelle is joining us from New Horizons Educational Group. So we will be presenting together to go over the FBA process and behavior intervention plans.
 
So I'm going to start by talking about the purpose of a functional behavioral assessment. So a definition is that an FBA is a structured process used to identify the cause of a student's behavior. It helps to determine the function of the behavior and the factors that maintain it. So the goal of an FBA is to look beyond just the behavior itself and really figure out what's driving it and why schools conduct FBAs.
So schools conduct FBAs to really understand and support student success rather than resorting to discipline. So FBAs are best practice and allow us to take a proactive and data-driven approach to behavior. And it helps us identify root cause and develop effective interventions. The FBI lets us answer three key questions. What does the behavior look like? When and where does it happen?
And what is the function or the purpose of the behavior? So again, I went over what actually a functional behavioral analysis is, why we conduct it. Again, it's to help better understand a student's behavior, to really figure out the function of the behavior. How we do that? We do that by observing and taking really clear cut data on where the behavior is happening, the function of the behavior.
And then again, when the behavior is happening within that school day. Okay, so the FBA process. So in order to get the process started, we need to identify the behavior. So what is the actual challenging behavior that we want to study and analyze? We need to gather the data through observations, teacher reports, interviews, and ideally you wanna observe that student across settings, including different classes and times of the day.
We need to analyze patterns and triggers. We usually do that through an ABC analysis, which is where we look at the antecedent, what's happening before the behavior, the behavior itself, and the consequence. And then we develop a hypothesis about why the behavior occurs. And I'm gonna talk a little bit about who should conduct an FBA and when it's warranted. So an FBA is conducted by a trained professional, usually a behavior specialist or a school psychologist.
And it's necessary when a student's behavior interferes with their learning or their learning of other students, or if it's a result of a disciplinary action. And I just want to note something really important is that an FBA does not require an IEP. So a child does not have to be classified, does not have to have an IEP in order to have that FBA occur.
And next, Michelle will talk about the key components of an FBA and the FBA process. Excellent. So Sarah did a good job going through an overview of the different steps in conducting a functional behavior assessment. And I just wanted to discuss some key considerations for each of those sections. So the first thing we want to make sure is, are easy behavior talking about observable and measurable? So
If you read on your child's functional behavior assessment, the definition of the behavior, would you know what counts and doesn't count? So as a non-example, a behavior that's not well-defined would sound something like this. Hitting is when a student is angry and tries to hurt someone by swinging at them. So that would not be a great example because I don't know.
the observer would need to assume intent behind the action, you know, when they're angry and trying to hurt somebody. So trying is not really able to be counted. And then what about swinging? So if we're talking about hitting, what if they miss or do attempts count? We're not really sure in that particular situation. Is there anything excluded? So especially students that are planning.
Playing on a playground. A lot of times they're playing tag. They're you know, playing typical social games and maybe we have a situation where we're counting that as aggression or hitting when it really should be excluded or a high five or a fist bump. So we really want to be clear about what things count and don't. So another example might be hitting is defined as any instance of a student making forceful contact with another person using an open or closed hand.
Making contact with any part of the other person's body includes hitting any other person's arms, legs, torso, head, or body part. Accidental contact, such as brushing against somebody while walking and contact made during appropriate play, is not included. So in that example, we know exactly what it looks like, what it doesn't look like, and what's included or not included. Something else we want to take into consideration is
Is the behavior that we're talking about developmentally appropriate to be defined as a problem? So as an example, I was called to consult on a case where there was a kindergarten student and the private provider said that off task was defined as any instance away from a teacher at any point in time. Well,
By that definition, I would venture to say most kindergartners are off task because they're looking away from the teacher. It happens all the time in kindergarten. And so we actually did take the data on that situation and we found that by that definition at any given point in time at the school, % of students in kindergarten were off task. So we really needed to redefine, okay, what is an extreme for a kindergartner? At what point should they be considered off task?
and we redefined it as 60 seconds of not engaged with whatever the activity was. We retook the data and then we said, okay, only 12 % of the students are off task by that definition. So we wanna make sure when we're defining the behavior, especially in a school environment, that's different than a home environment, and that we wanna take into consideration what is developmentally appropriate. The next thing we wanna talk about is when we're collecting data. So we're collecting data through direct observation, interviews, we might do review.
The thing I'm trying to figure out when we're looking at data is under what conditions does the behavior happen? And maybe even more importantly, under what conditions does the behavior not happen? And so we want to decide upfront when we're collecting the data, what data will be important based on the interviews and record reviews? So I've talked to the teachers, I've talked to the parents, I've kind of figured out what I think the problem might be. So whoever's leading the charge in collecting the data should create a common data sheet.
for all relevant staff members to collect the data on. I personally love Google Sheets or Google Forms, and it's really easy to give teachers and staff members a QR code to a Google Form so they can fill it out right then and there when it's happening. We post the QR codes around. So let's say a tantrum starts. We scan that start time, stop time, and then the data is automatically collected and feeds into a response sheet. So just a quick tip.
And then we want to make sure that when we're asking school staff to collect data that it's reasonable. So I had an instance I walked into a classroom with student was having a tantrum and engaging in a lot of aggression pretty frequent and the staff was standing there and. Instead of intervening and clicking every single time that this this hitting is happening and I said hold on a second, just tell me what time it started, what time it ended and and and let me know whether aggression happened because then we intervene and actually respond to this behavior.
And the thing that we're looking at here are we're looking for patterns. So is the behavior happening at a certain time of day? Maybe it's every afternoon at one o'clock. I don't know. So those are the things that we're looking at and it's important to look. Another thing to consider is a day of week. So maybe on Monday, every Monday, it's more likely the behavior is going to happen because they just came back from the weekend. But by Friday, you know, toward the end of the week, the behavior isn't happening so much. I'm looking at time of month.
We definitely had a student that had a spike at a certain time of month. Is it a certain subject? So is it reading or math or all of the subjects? And then is it a certain staff member regardless of the subject? So maybe there's a certain interaction that's happening that is creating an issue. And then we want to look at things like unstructured versus structured time. Okay, so those are all just some considerations when we're thinking of a data collection in ways that we can look at patterns. And specifically,
when we're talking about antecedents and behaviors and consequences, we want to look at what's happening in the environment before the behavior happens. We already defined the behavior and then what's happening in the environment after the behavior happened. So consequence doesn't mean a punishment. Consequence in our case just means anything that's happening in the environment after the behavior happened. So a lot of times I'll talk with the team and they'll say, but there's nothing happened. It's just happening randomly. I don't know what's causing it.
And so sometimes the answer isn't obvious. And when we're taking a functional and doing a conducting a functional behavior assessment, we want to take. I sometimes like the narrative data instead of check boxes for this, because then I can start to see the patterns and everything that's happening in the environment. So I had a student one time had a lot of aggression. She would take her iPad that she was supposed to be using to communicate and frisbee it across the classroom. And we really couldn't figure out what it was. And so we had to.
pay really close attention to everything that was happening in the environment. And what we found out was she didn't like laughing. And if anybody around was laughing, then it would occasion this increase in behavior. But it took a lot of really careful observation to find that pattern. We really want to look for the things that are happening most immediately.
So for example, it's time to do a math worksheet. The student throws the math sheet, starts picking on the peers next to them and cracking jokes. Well, is it the math or is it the attention from the peers? I'm not really sure which came first, the chicken or the egg. So then I have to think, okay, is this only happening in math? Well, if it's only happening in math, then math is the problem and not attention from peers, right? Because if it really was to get attention from peers, this would happen in across environments, regardless
list of what the subject was. So then our next decision is to figure out why the behaviors happening. What is the student getting or avoiding by engaging this behavior? So typically behaviors happening for one of those reasons. So we're going to develop a hypothesis based on those data that we took, and then we're going to test it. It cannot be everything in the kitchen sink. So a lot of times we get behavior plans and there's a function and somebody has checked every box on the. Not usually the case.
If we have multiple suspects, then I really want to look at those ABC data and count how many times did it occur for this and how many times for this, and there's usually a clear pattern. All right. So the last thing in this section we want to talk about is sometimes we conduct a functional behavior assessment and a BIP is not warranted, meaning that we've done an assessment and the team says we don't need a behavior plan.
Here are some situations where that might happen. So maybe we collect data and we decided that the behavior or whatever is happening is not impacting progress in the educational setting. That could be one situation or not. What's out happening outside of the pier? So in the situation with the off task definition, we decided we weren't going to conduct or write a behavior intervention plan because the expectation that was set was unrealistic. So.
We retook the data and the student was not off task more than other peers in the classroom. There was one time we took data that had 81 % of the students off task. If our student was in that classroom, I might start to ask, is this a specific student issue or is this a tier one classroom management issue? So is the student behaving any differently than the rest of the students in that classroom? If the answer is.
Yes, they have problem behavior and no, it's not different than anyone else in the classroom, then we probably need to intervene at the classroom level before we're looking at the student level intervention. Another specific instance where we would not write a behavior intervention plan is what if there was an underlying or untreated medical issue that needed to be addressed that's causing the behavior? I was asked to write a behavior plan to have a student wear her glasses because they hypothesize that she wasn't able to access instructional materials.
but there was no documentation that she had a correct prescription. So I wasn't willing to write a behavior plan until we had verification from a medical provider that the prescription was correct and it would make a difference and that we've identified she truly did have a need to wear those glasses. And then we can talk about the behavior plan. So those would be examples of when we wouldn't. Now, you cannot go to a student study team meeting and sign permission for a behavior plan and a functional behavior assessment and expect a one week turnaround.
That is not a sufficient time to look at patterns in behavior. We really want to make sure the team has a sufficient time to collect data to look for those patterns, because again, if it's something that's only happening at certain times of the week, we need several weeks worth of data to prove that hypothesis. So those are just some considerations about the functional behavior. We'll talk more about the behavior intervention plan considerations, but we're going to let Taylor talk about the legal framework and parent rights.
Absolutely. Thank you so much, Michelle. And I just had a couple of things to add before I get into the legal framework. I know so many definitions, so many things when it comes to behavior. Behavior is complex and measuring it correctly is critical for actually understanding, as Michelle mentioned, patterns, addressing progress and making informed decisions. So behaviors can be measured in a variety of different ways.
One of the ways is through direct measurement, right? By recording frequency, by counting how often a behavior occurs. For example, a frequency, a student raises their hand five times in class. Duration recording, measuring how long a behavior lasts. For example, a child engages in a tantrum for a duration of 12 minutes. Latency recording, which is measuring how long it takes for a behavior to start.
after a cue is given. For example, a student begins their assignment 30 seconds after being given redirection or instructions. Indirect measures. These are typically best when direct observation isn't possible. In schools, you will see behavior rating scales and checklists. These tools are completed by teachers or parents, such as the BASC-3 or Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Also, interviews and surveys.
asking teachers, parents, or the child themselves about the behaviors and their triggers. Also, time-based measures. Some of the time-based measures are a little bit more complex. For example, we have partial interval recording. This is best for tracking behaviors across specific periods. For example, did the behavior occur at any point during a set time frame?
Consider this scenario. You have a student, they called out in class at least once during a 10 minute period. So during that 10 minute period, that behavior occurred one time. Then you have whole interval recording. Did the behavior occur for the entire timeframe that you were recording? For example, the child remains seated at their desk for the entire five minute interval. And then lastly, momentary time sampling.
This is when we check if a behavior occurs at the moment. Or if it's happening at a different time, for example, you can check every 10 minutes to see if a student is on task when you check and then you would record at that point. So I know that those are some complex areas, but when navigating FBAs and navigating behavioral data, I think that those are some really important measures to understand. And now I want to talk about the legal frameworks.
and your rights as parents. Under IDAA and Section 504, there are very, very specific legal requirements schools must follow. An FBA or functional behavior assessment is required in two different situations. The first situation is when a student with a disability has behavior that's affecting their learning or the learning of others around them. The second situation would be when disciplinary action results in a change of placement.
For example, if a student is suspended for more than 10 consecutive days, or there's a pattern of removal that amount to a change in placement. Also, that does constitute in most states an MDR, Manifestation Determination Resolution. So now I wanna briefly talk about parent rights. These protections ensure that families are involved in the process and that schools are following the laws. Informed consent is required
before an FBA can be conducted. This means that the school cannot move forward without your approval as a parent. Parents also have the right to participate, and I mean actively participate in the process. They can provide their input, share observations, and contribute valuable information about their child's behavior. Finally, schools must ensure that qualified professionals, as Sarah mentioned, conduct the FBA.
This should be a board certified behavior analyst, better known as a BCBA, a school psychologist, or another trained specialist who understands behavior and data analysis. This should not be a teacher or someone who does not have behavioral training. Understanding these legal rights really are going to empower parents and advocates to really, really dig in and advocate for their children.
and it ensures that schools remain accountable in providing these appropriate supports. Some of the legal precedents, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Students with disabilities not covered by IDEA may still receive an FBA if their behavior directly impacts their ability to access education. ADA is the American with Disabilities Act. This law ensures that students with disabilities
are not discriminated against in any way if they require an FBA. If their behavior is related to their disability and it's affecting their school population and their participation, they are required and are eligible to receive an FBA. I'm going to jump in here and talk about the BIP or the Behavioral Intervention Plan. So how does a BIP support positive behavioral change? So first, let's go over what a Behavioral Intervention Plan is.
So it's a structured written plan developed and it's based off of the FBA, the FBA findings. So it focuses on teaching positive behaviors to replace the challenging behaviors that were defined during the FBA. It outlines strategies to reduce problem behaviors and teach positive alternatives. So think of it as like a roadmap based on the information gathered from the FBA. And why is it important to use evidence-based interventions when
when creating the BIP, we have to use data-driven strategies because that's proven to been shown effective. And we have to tailor to the individual students. So obviously every student with a behavior plan, their behavior plan is going to be different because it's gonna be based off of them as an individual. And now Michelle's gonna talk about the key components of a behavior intervention plan and its implementation. So the first thing we need to define
If we have a student that's exhibiting a behavior that we've identified through assessment that is problematic and impacting their ability to be participating in their educational environment, we have to decide what else do we want them to do instead. So if our student is hitting, then we want to define a replacement behavior. So again,
When you're looking at your child's behavior intervention plan or you're writing a behavior intervention plan, it really should be again, not a menu of possible options to select from. They. To address exactly how a student should get or avoid the things that they want in a more appropriate manner. So those things were all defined in the functional behavior assessment. We're looking at how can we behave differently to still obtain the desired result of getting what we want or getting away from that.
So for an example, if a student is engaging in a tantrum when they're told no, that they can't have something that they want, we can teach them to use a calming corner instead of having a temper tantrum. So that would be a replacement behavior. So we want to make sure that we're prepared to track progress toward learning these new skills. So if we said that this is what we're supposed to teach the student to do instead, how are we going to track their progress with learning that new skill?
This is a good thing to put on the IEP and the Individual Education Plan in the behavior domain along with any other behavior reduction goals for the behaviors that we want to decrease. So we want to not just talk about decreasing behavior, but what behaviors we want to increase instead. OK, so the next thing we want to talk about is what are preventative strategies that we can implement to reduce problem behavior? So how can we arrange the environment at school?
to make it less likely that the problem behavior will occur. So an example of that would be something like reviewing expectations before a task. So if it's something that we know the student doesn't like math, well, let's review the expectations of how we're going to do this math. And then we can talk about what will happen and what will, if a student follows or doesn't follow those explanations. So sometimes I even like to make a flow chart.
You have choices. You could choose this or you can choose this. If you choose this, then these things are likely to happen. And if you choose this, then these things are likely to happen. It helps them to kind of visually organize how their choices will impact their their day and environment. So in the case of the math student who didn't was having some problems during math time.
A preventative strategy might be to go ahead and put them in a small group with the teacher during small group time or arrange for a support facilitation or inclusion teacher to come in the classroom during small group time to work with the students so that they have more support during that time and are less likely to engage in that problem behavior. So again, we've set up the environment for success. Now we have to teach and reinforce those other behaviors that we talked about that we want the students to do instead. So here's a key.
The time to teach a behavior is not when the problem behavior is happening. So at that point, we're not focused on learning. We're focused on getting away from situations or getting what we want. So we need to teach problem behavior and stable functioning. So example, if we're going to teach using a calming corner, then we have to provide multiple opportunities during the day where we're prompting the student to go to that calming corner. So what is the teacher going to say?
go calm down or ask all for a choice. Would you like to use a calming corner or would you like to do XYZ, whatever the choices might be? And then we have to teach them what they're going to do when they get there. So just going to the calming corner is probably not going to be sufficient to get the behavior to deescalate if we're already, you know, amped up in the middle of a temper tantrum. So the suggestion is the calming corners should contain multiple tasks that are
I say cognitively distracting, so you can't think about these things and continue to engage in problem behavior as well. So I have a student that really likes math and he likes to name all the perfect squares. So OK, we're going to go to the common corner. We're going to name all the perfect squares, whatever it is that they're interested in or might cognitively distract them. In the case of the student that didn't like laughing, she didn't have a lot of communication skills, so we taught her with a augmentative communication device to say no laughing, please, or let's get out of here.
so that she had an appropriate way to ask to leave the situation or say that she didn't like it. And we could then address the situation without her having to frisbee the iPad across the room. It's really important that the environment get better for students when they choose appropriate behavior versus inappropriate behavior. And we'll talk about that a little bit more in the inappropriate behavior section. So how is the environment going to be better for the student engaging in what we want them to do versus not want them to do?
that section which would be defining appropriate consequences and responses. So hopefully we have good preventive strategies. We're learning new problems, new problem behaviors to replace the problem behaviors and we don't have the problem behavior. But inevitably sometimes these problems still happen, right? In the consequences section. So again, just the response to behavior, not punishment, just what's going to happen after. It should read like a step by step flow chart. Who's going to respond and in what order?
So if a student's having a tantrum and they need to be removed from the classroom, well, who is the order of the list to respond? Maybe the guidance counselors first, the assistant principal second. If the school doesn't have a plan for who's gonna respond in what order, then either no one responds or everyone responds and neither case is good typically. We want to make sure the student has returned to stable functioning before teaching or talking. So that goes with the teaching and replacement behaviors.
You know if you're upset and you're kind of amped up if someone's barking commands at you, you're less likely to then calm down and engage in that. And then in the consequence strategies, ideally we want to include a time to practice or the replacement behavior after we have deescalated the situation, right? So we can return to the situation say, hey, I know you were really upset when the student was laughing. We're going to say no laughing, please and have them practice that skill in the situation. That way they can practice doing the things we want them to do instead.
Be very careful about not accidentally reinforcing behavior that we want to decrease. So sometimes we have situations where things, students get things that are bigger and better after engaging in problem behavior than they do if they're not engaging in problem behavior. So an example is we remove a student from the class, they go to the office, everyone in the office is talking to them, asking how the day is, delivering stickers and candy and all of these things. But none of those things happen when the students
not misbehaving. So you've got to think about and watch the environment as we're developing these behavior plans to make sure that the best things happen when the problem happens and the other things are kind of minimized after problem behavior happens. Okay, so let's talk about ongoing monitoring and support. Behavior plans are supposed to work. They are not a checkbox to say we did it and now what's next.
If they don't work, then that means we need to be in relentless pursuit of what does work. It's not another placement isn't going to solve the problem necessarily by itself. So we have to figure out what is going to work. And the way I like to think about that is first we have to train the staff. So whoever's supposed to be implementing this plan has to be trained on the plan. So anyone who's involved with the student and that might
be person responding to problem behavior needs to know what the plan is. What is the playbook? What is that flowchart say is going to happen? I would request that if you are school or if you are a parent, get a sign in sheet for the training, right? That then you have documentation. Hey, we train the staff on this plan. Here's an analogy. If a doctor prescribes you a Z-Pak to cure strep throat, but you take Skittles instead, it won't work.
So if we wrote a behavior plan and we don't implement it and we do something else instead, we can't expect it to work. You're not gonna go back to the doctor and ask for a different prescription. You've got to take the one that you were given. So if you take it and it doesn't work, then you can go back to the doctor and say, hey, that didn't work. So when we're doing an FBA and a BIP, we need to know that it's working. And the only way to know if it's working is to implement the plan that's written.
So making sure that we train the staff and then making sure that we're monitoring fidelity of the implementation will help us to know if it's being implemented. And then if it's not working, we can go back to the drawing board and say, no, this part's not working. This part is working and figure out what we need to do instead. So how are we going to know it's working? We know it's working by looking at data. We have to continue to take data even after.
The behavior plan is written. It's not just part of the functional behavior process. We probably don't need to take ABC data anymore because we've already decided what the function is. The only time I would do that is if we suggest if we're suspicious that the function is shifted or a new behaviors arise and we want to make sure it's still under the same. It's happening. So we need to take those data and just like Taylor talked about, we're going to take data using usually frequency or duration. Be careful about the point sheet.
So we don't sometimes point sheet data just says, hey, they got 80 % of their points for the day. OK, but you called me in and said that he was disrupting three hours of your day. You got 80 % of his points. It doesn't sound so bad. So we want to make direct measure and have a good picture of the understanding of what's happening by looking at the data being collected. OK, so we then have to write clear measurable goals. That's going to go on our.
IEP as well. Typically under the behavior domain we would write a goal for reduction. So here is a bad example of a goal. The student will stop hitting others as much. OK, well that doesn't tell me a whole lot, so a better example would be by May the student will engage in zero instances of hitting per week across all school settings as measured by teacher and staff data collection with 100 % accuracy for three consecutive weeks. Then I know what the criteria are.
for success. And then I have some measurements that we can put on the IEP data. Let's talk a little bit more on the next slide about implementation and accountability.
So the role of the teachers and the school staff and the parents are to implement the plan. So sometimes parents are involved by monitoring the information coming home. Maybe you are monitoring point sheets that are coming home and looking at those data. A behavior plan, we talked about it not being a checkbox, but it's not a checkbox to move a student to, I say anywhere about here, ABH. A lot of times I will be called into a student study team meeting and they're like, okay, let's get this plan done because
He's got to go to this school, that school anywhere but here. It's actually supposed to work. We need to get the team focused on finding out what does work by conducting and writing a good behavior plan. And then we can talk about where does that need to be implemented? Because we need to look at what they need and then ask the question, well, where can that happen? Where is the best place? So I always say for walls the students in, I've got to figure out what's going to work for this
student and that's how the team should operate is really being relentless pursuit of that solution. And we need to make some decisions about how long you plan to work. You can't say you're going to come back to the table in a week. Just like we can't write the plan in a week, we also can't just implement it for a week before we're making decisions about changing it. We should probably agree to come back to the table.
if there's a significant increase or a really significant decrease in the problem behavior. It's likely that this is going to happen more frequently than your annual IEP meeting. It probably should. And we do need to revisit and update the behavior plan as needed. So if a student requires very frequent reinforcement and we've seen no problem, we can decrease that frequency of reinforcement and how many times that we're having to, you know, reinforce that behavior so that it's more likely in
that they can be successful with a natural environmental reinforcement. So here's a bad example. We had a 10th grader that we were called in to look at the bib and we pulled up the date that second grade. It's unlikely that the second grade behavior plan is relevant in 10th grade. A lot has changed between then. The school is different, the environment's different. The behavior assessment and the behavior plan should be relevant to the environment in which it occurs.
which is also why sometimes home behavior plans from outside providers aren't necessarily applicable in the school setting. So we still need to make sure that we've conducted the assessment in the environment where it happens. I'm going to pass that back off to Taylor to talk about the legal rights and advocacy. Thank you so much, Michelle. That was really informative. Now let's dive into parent rights and the FBA and BIP process.
and how you as parents can advocate effectively for your child. Understanding the legal protections under IDEA in Section 504 is really, really critical to ensuring that your student receives the behavioral support that they're entitled to. Parents have the right to request an FBA and a behavior intervention plan or VIP if your child's behavior, like I mentioned before, is impacting their ability to learn.
you don't have to wait for the school to initiate the process. You can make a formal request. Another misconception is that ABA therapy or functional behavior assessments are only for children with autism. That is not true. There are even neurotypical children can benefit from having behavior intervention plans or functional behavior assessments conducted or having ABA therapy. As a parent,
You have the right to request this, like I'd mentioned before, and the schools must follow through with that proper implementation. A behavior intervention plan is not just a document, it is a legally binding plan. Once it's in place and part of that IEP, the school is responsible for ensuring that all staff that interact with your child follow the strategies and interventions outlined in the plan.
Now I want to talk a little bit about progress monitoring. One of the biggest mistakes that schools make is limiting behavioral progress monitoring to quarterly updates or set timelines or during annual reviews. These are living documents, People change, behaviors change on a regular basis. So their plan should change and their interventions should change and be reevaluated as needed.
These interventions should be based on data, not timeframes. Behavior doesn't operate on a schedule, unfortunately. It changes based on circumstance, support, consistency. So, you you can't just wait for something major to happen and then say, well, I followed their behavior intervention plan. That doesn't quite work. The effectiveness should be reassessed on a continual basis.
If an intervention isn't working, adjustments should be made in real time rather than waiting months and months and months to address the issue. As a parent or as an advocate, you have the right to request frequent progress updates, access to behavioral data, and team meetings if you notice that your child's plan isn't working. Advocacy in this process is really key to ensuring your child gets the support that they need to succeed in the school environment.
Now I will pass it along to Sarah so that she can give you some more tips on how to advocate for a stronger behavior intervention plan and functional behavior assessment. Sure. So I'm going to talk about how to advocate for a stronger FBA and BIP. So I have some questions that you can ask at an IEP meeting while you're involved in this process. So the first question is, what data supports the need for an FBA or a BIP?
So has the team conducted a thorough review of disciplinary incidences, classroom observations, or teacher reports? And what specific behaviors are interfering with learning and how are they being documented? Another question to ask is how will progress be tracked and communicated? So like Taylor said, how often will behavior data be reviewed and who will be responsible for collecting it? What communication methods will be used for keeping...
families informed of what's happening? So will you have meetings, progress reports, data graphs, et cetera? And how will the team determine if the BIP is effective or needs modification? More questions to be asked related to reviewing behavioral data and to ensure that data is collected consistently is what data collection tools are being used? Are they using ABC charts? Are they using frequency counts? Are they using duration tracking? That should be something that you should be informed of as parents or advocates.
 
when you're working with a child with a BIP. And are all team members trained in consistent data collection? You want to look for patterns that indicate effective intervention. So are there specific triggers times of days or environments where the behaviors increase or decrease? And do the data trends show improvement or is the behavior escalating? Those are all things that the data should show and that you should be having discussions about with the team. Another area to ask about is addressing concerns about ineffective intervention. So readjusting the plan if progress is not being made. So if behaviors persist, what alternative strategies or supports can be added? Can additional training or professional development be provided to staff implementing the BIP? And then holding the school accountable for proper implementation. So you want to ask how is fidelity of implementation being measured? If the BIP is not being followed as written, what steps will be taken to correct this?
And what role would the IEP team play in ongoing monitoring and adjustments? I'm going to turn it now over to Michelle to talk about the legal rights. We just talked about the legal rights, but specific to changes within the US Department of Education.
Thanks. So in November of 2024, so right at the end of the last year, the US Department of Education saw the need to provide some guidance to the country as a whole about best practices with FBAs and BIPs. So that guidance, it's a lengthy paper, so it is available to the public if you're interested in reading more about that.
They also did do a webinar breaking it down a little bit more, so that is available to the public as well. But they really wanted to provide some guidance around using evidence-based practices and why it's important to conduct a functional behavior assessment. So just picking some interventions from wherever is not typically effective, we wanted to highlight the importance of doing the assessment, conducting the analysis,
and matching the interventions that we're providing so that they actually address the problem behavior that we're seeing. So they looked at, can we provide positive and proactive strategies to prevent the behavior from happening to begin? And those are things that we talked about throughout this webinar earlier and the news that they wanted to get to the different school teams across the country. Let's focus on positive behavior supports.
And then how can we reduce the reliance on the punishment procedures like discipline, exclusionary discipline, specifically with suspensions and restraints? So we want to reduce the use of suspensions and restraints. And I know most states have varying laws around whether those interventions are even able to be used. I know some states don't allow restraint at all or seclusion, removing the student from the environment.
So your state may be different, but regardless, we would rather increase and react proactively and not reactively behaviors already have. We can provide the team some guidance about that, then hopefully that will reduce those occurrences. And then we wanna make sure that behavior supports are accessible to all students. I heard.
Taylor say and Sarah say that it doesn't matter whether or not they have an individual education plan that all students have the right to a functional behavior assessment behavior intervention plan if that need is warranted. And we want to make sure that we are not singling out different categories and that we're not providing disproportionate discipline to different groups in our education process.
Hi, everyone. My name is Sarah Loteck. I'm one of the special education advocates here at K Altman Law. And today we're going to be doing a webinar on functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans. We also have a guest, Michelle Goofy. She's from New Horizons Educational Group, and she's going to be joining with us and presenting as well.
Perfect. Today we're going to discuss functional behavior assessments and behavior intervention plans and the new DOE guidance on those.
All right, Sarah, take it away. Okay, so first as an introduction, today we're gonna be presenting, it's going to be Taylor Ruiz, who is our Director of Special Education Advocacy here at Kaltman Law. And I already introduced myself, Sarah Loteck, I'm one of the Special Education Advocates. And then Michelle is joining us from New Horizons Educational Group. So we will be presenting together to go over the FBA process and behavior intervention plans.
So I'm going to start by talking about the purpose of a functional behavioral assessment. So a definition is that an FBA is a structured process used to identify the cause of a student's behavior. It helps to determine the function of the behavior and the factors that maintain it. So the goal of an FBA is to look beyond just the behavior itself and really figure out what's driving it. And why schools conduct FBAs.
So schools conduct FBAs to really understand and support student success rather than resorting to discipline. So FBAs are best practice and allow us to take a proactive and data-driven approach to behavior. And it helps us identify root cause and develop effective interventions. The FBI lets us answer three key questions. What does a behavior look like? When and where does it happen? And what is the function
or the purpose of the behavior.
Do I need change slots? Yeah.
So again, I went over what actually a functional behavioral analysis is, why we conduct it. Again, it's to help better understand a student's behavior, to really figure out the function of the behavior. How we do that, we do that by observing and taking really clear cut data on where the behavior is happening, the function of the behavior, and then again, when the behavior is happening within that school day.
Okay, so the FBA process. So in order to get the process started, we need to identify the behavior. So what is the actual challenging behavior that we want to study and analyze? We need to gather the data through observations, teacher reports, interviews, and ideally you want to observe that student across settings, including different classes and times of the day.
We need to analyze patterns and triggers. We usually do that through an ABC analysis, which is where we look at the antecedent, what's happening before the behavior, the behavior itself, and the consequence. And then we develop a hypothesis about why the behavior occurs.
And I'm going to talk a little bit about who should conduct conduct an FBA and when it's warranted. So an FBA is conducted by a trained professional, usually a behavior specialist or a school psychologist. And it's necessary when a student's behavior interferes with their learning or their learning of other students, or if it's a result of a disciplinary action. And I just want to note something really important is that an FBA does not require an IEP. So a child does not have to be classified.
does not have to have an IEP in order to have that FBA occur.
And next, Michelle will talk about the key components of an FBA and the FBA process. Excellent, so Sarah did a good job going through an overview of the different steps in conducting a functional behavior assessment, and I just wanted to discuss some key considerations for each of those sections. So the first thing we want to make sure. Is our is the behavior talking about observable and measurable so?
If you read on your child's functional behavior assessment, the definition of the behavior, would you know what counts and doesn't count? So as a non-example, a behavior that's not well-defined would sound something like this. Hitting is when a student is angry and tries to hurt someone by swinging at them. So that would not be a great example because
 
I don't know, the observer would need to assume intent behind the action, you know, when they're angry and trying to hurt somebody. So trying is not really able to be counted. And then what about swinging? So if we're talking about hitting, what if they miss or do attempts count? We're not really sure in that particular situation. Is there anything excluded? especially students that are...
Playing on a playground. A lot of times they're playing tag. They're you know, playing typical social games and maybe we have a situation where we're counting that as aggression or hitting when it really should be excluded or a high five or a fist bump. So we really want to be clear about what things count and don't. So another example might be hitting is defined as any instance of a student making forceful contact with another person using an open or closed hand.
Making contact with any part of the other person's body includes hitting any other person's arms, legs, torso, head, or body part. Accidental contact, such as brushing against somebody while walking and contact made during appropriate play, is not included. So in that example, we know exactly what it looks like, what it doesn't look like, and what's included or not included. Something else we want to take into consideration is
Is the behavior that we're talking about developmentally appropriate to be defined as a problem? So as an example, I was called to consult on a case where there was a kindergarten student and the private provider said that off task was defined as any instance away from a teacher at any point in time. Well,
By that definition, I would venture to say most kindergartners are off task because they're looking away from the teacher. It happens all the time in kindergarten. And so we actually did take the data on that situation and we found that by that definition at any given point in time at the school, % of students in kindergarten were off task. So we really needed to redefine, okay, what is an extreme for a kindergartner? At what point should they be considered off task?
and we redefined it as 60 seconds of not engaged with whatever the activity was. We retook the data and then we said, okay, only 12 % of the students are off task by that definition. So we wanna make sure when we're defining the behavior, especially in a school environment, that's different than a home environment and that we wanna take into consideration what is developmentally appropriate. The next thing we wanna talk about is when we're collecting data. So we're collecting data through direct observation, interviews, we might do review.
The thing I'm trying to figure out when we're looking at data is under what conditions does the behavior happen? And maybe even more importantly, under what conditions does the behavior not happen? And so we want to decide upfront when we're collecting the data, what data will be important based on the interviews and record reviews? So I've talked to the teachers, I've talked to the parents, I've kind of figured out what I think the problem might be. So whoever's leading the charge in collecting the data should create a common data sheet.
for all relevant staff members to collect the data on. I personally love Google Sheets or Google Forms. And it's really easy to give teachers and staff members a QR code to a Google Form so they can fill it out right then and there when it's happening. We post the QR codes around. let's say a tantrum starts. We scan that start time, stop time, and then the data is automatically collected and feeds into a response sheet. So just a quick tip.
And then we want to make sure that when we're asking school staff to collect data that it's reasonable. So I had an instance I walked into a classroom with student was having a tantrum and engaging in a lot of aggression pretty frequent and the staff was standing there and. Instead of intervening and clicking every single time that this this hitting is happening and I said hold on a second, just tell me what time it started, what time it ended and and and let me know whether aggression happened because then we intervene and actually respond to this behavior.
And the thing that we're looking at here are we're looking for patterns. So is the behavior happening at a certain time of day? Maybe it's every afternoon at one o'clock. I don't know. So those are the things that we're looking at and it's important to look. Another thing to consider is a day of week. So maybe on Monday, every Monday, it's more likely the behavior is going to happen because they just came back from the weekend. But by Friday, you know, toward the end of the week, the behavior isn't happening so much. I'm looking at time of month.
We definitely had a student that had a spike at a certain time of month. Is it a certain subject? So is it reading or math or all of the subjects? And then is it a certain staff member regardless of the subject? So maybe there's a certain interaction that's happening that is creating an issue. And then we want to look at things like unstructured versus structured type. Okay, so those are all just some considerations when we're thinking of a data collection in ways that we can look at patterns and specifically.
when we're talking about antecedents and behaviors and consequences, we want to look at what's happening in the environment before the behavior happens. We already defined the behavior and then what's happening in the environment after the behavior. Okay, so we are finished with the webinar. Thank you everyone for participating and for joining us. So if you need any more help related to FBAs, BIPs or
IEPs, you can follow up with us at K Altman Law. Our special education advocacy team is ready to help you navigate the special education world. And you can reach out and schedule a consultation call with our intake specialists today. The most important thing here is that you are entitled as a parent to request a functional behavior assessment if...
the behavior is impacting your child's education. Also, if you have any other questions or concerns, feel free to reach us at 855-K-Altman Law. Have a great day, everyone. Thanks for joining.
I hope you enjoyed this episode focusing on functional behavior assessments presented by our special education team. Join us in our next episode as we continue the journey into student discipline. If you like this podcast or any of our other podcasts, make sure you subscribe. If you need help, reach out to us at 248-817-8510 or check us out at kaltmanlaw.com.
 

Advocating for Gifted Students: Legal Rights, Education, and Support: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 36

Advocating for Gifted Students: Legal Rights, Education, and Support
Welcome to another episode of Legally Blind Justice! Today, we’re tackling an important and often overlooked topic—advocating for gifted students and ensuring they receive the education and support they deserve.
Gifted education is more than just advanced coursework—it intersects with special education, legal protections, and the need for proper accommodations. Joining us are experts Dr. Taylor Ruiz and Crystal Ash, who will break down the legal rights of gifted students, the importance of early identification, and how families can advocate effectively within the education system.
If you have questions about education law, special education rights, or need legal support for your child’s educational needs, visit www.kaltmanlaw.com or call 516-788-5534. The team at K Altman Law is here to help you navigate the system and fight for the best possible outcome for your child.
Stay tuned for an insightful discussion, and don’t forget to subscribe, share, and leave a review if you find this episode helpful. Let’s get started!Unofficial Transcript:
Welcome to the Legally Blind Justice Podcast, where we break down legal rights, advocate for those in need,
and empower you with the knowledge to navigate the legal system. I'm your host, Tim Markley, and today we're diving into a critical, but often misunderstood area of education law, advocating for gifted students and ensuring they receive the support that they need. Gifted education isn't just about high achieving students. It's part of a special education system that too often gets overlooked. These students face unique challenges.
from misidentification to a lack of appropriate accommodations. And today, we'll explore how parents, educators, and advocates can fight for their rights. Joining us today are Dr. Taylor Ruiz, Senior Director of Special Education at K. Altman Law, and Crystal Ash, a dedicated advocate for gifted students. Together, we'll break down what it really means to be a gifted student, the myths surrounding giftedness,
and how the law plays a crucial role in securing the rights of educational support. So whether you're a parent fighting for your child and educator looking for guidance, or just someone interested in education law, stick around. You won't want to miss this episode. Thank you for joining us today to learn more about advocating for gifted children, understanding their rights as well as their educational needs.
My name is Dr. Taylor Ruiz and I am the Senior Director of Special Education here at K. Altman Law. And my co-presenter is Crystal Ash, who is an advocate who specializes in gifted education here at K. Altman Law. Just to talk a little bit about what we do here at K. Altman Law, our team works on advocacy. So what we do is we partner with families to ensure that students
have what they need to meet the IEP requirements for IDEA, FAPE, and other various education laws. We work in tandem with our educational attorneys to secure the best outcomes for our students and ensure that they're getting the accommodations that they need as well as appropriate placement. So today we're going to talk more about gifted students and how gifted education relates to special education.
So for this webinar, just to give you a little bit more detail on what we're looking at today, in terms of gifted education and special education, we're really focusing on gifted education as a tenant of special education and touching on some aspects of gifted education, gifted children, special education, and other aspects that you might not be aware of yet. I'm sure you've all heard of gifted education, right, because you're here, but gifted education really is
much more detailed. It has a lot more depth than you might realize. And so we really want to touch on the fact that gifted education is special education. And to do that, we're kind of breaking the webinar up into three different sections. First, we have our defined section. This is where we're really going to dig in what gifted education is and who our gifted students are. Then we're going to jump into debunking. So there are a lot of misconceptions and myths about gifted education.
what it looks like, who our gifted students are, and there are some misconceptions about what that looks like in the classroom and at home, what their characteristics are. So we want to debunk anything that you might've heard that is not quite accurate to what we actually see in the classroom. And then we'll be moving on to the develop stage, which is what you can do for your gifted students, either as a teacher, as an administrator, or even as a parent. To go into our introduction.
Here at Kaltman Law, we are advocates and we're all really devoted to special education. We come from all types of backgrounds. We have educational diagnosticians, behavior analysts, previous school principals, previous school district administrators, individuals who are well-versed in education law and policy, as well as our education attorneys. I myself come from a
clinical behavioral health background with an emphasis in behavior analysis. And I was previously a school principal in the state of Florida. So like myself, our team is very diverse and well-versed in all of things special education. And we work together to secure the best outcomes for our students. And a little bit more about my background. I am a former educator. I was a general classroom teacher in the high school setting.
in South Carolina as an English teacher. I do also have my master's degree in curriculum and instruction, as well as my certification in gifted education. So I'm very familiar with what gifted education looks like in the classroom and from that curricular side. So a little bit about defining gifted education. We really wanted to begin with defining what gifted education is because like I said, there are a lot of misconceptions out there.
And whether or not you know what gifted education is, where you have a gifted student in your life, gifted and talented very likely is not what you have heard of before or have been led to believe. It's very in-depth, it's very diverse. And these gifted students are more than just that typical successful good student that you might think of when you hear the words gifted and talented. There are actually six profiles of gifted students and giftedness that
gifted students can fall into. And each of these profiles has a very in-depth description, not only of the successfulness that that student might show in their giftedness, but in how they can be gifted. So giftedness is not just academically successful, right? There can be musical giftedness, there can be visual arts giftedness, there can be physical giftedness for students that
are in sports and there can even be giftedness in terms of critical thinking or leadership. So we're trying to really expand your view of what giftedness is so that we can shift that mindset into understanding it as a tenant of special education rather than the opposite of special education, which is generally how it's presented in mainstream media. So diving into those profiles of gifted students, traditional academic performance,
being very high is what we are familiar with. And that is what our type one successful gifted students look like. So these are children who demonstrate behaviors or feelings or needs and have learned the system and what the system expects from them. So this is that typical gifted student that you probably think of in your mind when you hear gifted and talented. This is someone who excels academically. This is a quiet student that is well behaved.
probably sits at the front of the class, gets all A's, tutors their peers. This is generally who you think of. But what you might not realize is that our successful type one students, these students are often very reliant emotionally and mentally on the structure and the guidance of their teachers and of the school system, which can stunt them creatively. So this is really why we're holding this webinar is to see how
Gifted students are very multifaceted and how even the successful type ones have some drawbacks and that giftedness is not necessarily this picture perfect thing that you might imagine. So our successful type ones often fall into a pattern of thinking that relies on that structure.
But because they are so outwardly successful, how they are outwardly very academically gifted and they do well in school, we might not see that aspect of them. And because of that, we might not notice some withdrawal or some self-injurious mental thinking or behavior that stems from the fact that they feel that pressure to be perfect.
because they have been typecast as this perfect gifted student. The other hand, we also have our type two. These type twos challenging students are still gifted, but they are gifted gifted divergently. So many schools actually fail to identify type two students because they don't fit that same typical mold as that type one successful student. These students.
because they aren't identified become frustrated very easily because they're not receiving those services for giftedness that they need for their needs to be met. So they often present more challenging and I'll put that in air quotes, challenging behaviors that kind of contradict that image of the gifted student that you come to expect with that type one. They might be sarcastic, they might be the class clown, they might talk back, not out of defiance, but because they need to be challenged.
and they are not, their needs aren't being met. And so the behaviors that they exhibit kind of seek that and may not necessarily be what you would expect from a gifted student because they're really not being treated like a gifted student. And if their needs aren't being met, they're not going to be as successful. And that need for validation is going to be expressed in other ways. These type two challenging students are actually at risk for becoming a type four, which we call a dropout.
We'll get to that in a second. But this stage one, two and three type gifted student need a lot of attention or they are at risk of dropping from that gifted standpoint and actually losing those services that they need or losing the desire to achieve their giftedness. Our type three, the underground. This is generally a middle school female or maybe a high school male. This usually manifests a little bit later because it is
very socially influenced. So these underground type three gifted students are actually trying to hide their giftedness. They have a strong desire to fit in that giftedness contradicts and oftentimes makes harder because as we see with that perception of a gifted student, they're kind of put on a pedestal up here with their standard peers on a lower level from them in the eyes of school or in the eyes of media. And so our gifted students are standing out.
And these underground students don't want to stand out. They might be experiencing bullying, right? Because they are an easy target, because they are being set apart from their peers as gifted students. And they really need a gentle touch, because there's a reason that they're going underground and hiding their giftedness. They might be getting bullied, they might be losing friends, they might be uncomfortable with the attention that they're getting as a gifted student.
And the more you push them to accept their giftedness and accept those services, the harder they're gonna push back. And we're at risk for losing these type 3s to that type 4, the dropout, because they feel a little bit out of control. Without that social standing and that social comfort that their other peers may experience, they're at risk for rejecting their giftedness and losing it altogether.
Not to say that they would actually lose the gift, but they would lose the desire to express that gift and foster it, which is ideally what we want for our gifted students. Type four, this is our dropout. So this is not literally a dropout, right? This is not somebody who quits school at any level. These are gifted students that have dropped off the face of giftedness, you almost want to say. These students are angry. These are students that have been
ignored for such a long time or in the case of the type one, two or three that move away from their giftedness, these are students that aren't receiving services that foster their giftedness. Their needs are not being met regardless of how we got there, whether they have gone unidentified or they have slowly moved away from that. And these students often become bitter because they feel rejected, right? They're not being taken care of academically or physically or
artistically, however their giftedness may manifest. And so they start to reject others because of the rejection that they're feeling. So that's why we call them the dropout is because they are dropping out of participating in their giftedness. They're going to move on to interests that have nothing to do with school. They may withdraw from school. This might be your student that has their head down or their headphones in or their hood up because they have been rejected for so long and nobody else has taken care of them.
that now they feel like they have to. This is a defensive response in response to their needs not being met. So they're going to seek other areas to be validated in and to feel accepted in because the school system has not been that for them for so long. And that's how our type one to threes end up shifting into a type four dropout is whether they have withdrawn themselves in the case of a type three.
or their challenging behaviors as in the case of a type two, push teachers away from them, or even in the case of a type one, if they crack under that pressure of being the perfect gifted student, that's how we see students end up in a type four if they had been identified previously. Largely though, our type fours are students that were not identified or they were identified far too late as a gifted student to really foster their giftedness and make that something for them to be proud of.
Our type five on our slides here, we have it double labeled. Generally now we call them twice exceptional. These are really the students that start to break that molded thinking of a gifted student versus special education. This is where we marry giftedness and special education because our twice exceptional students are students that are both gifted in one area or more than one area.
but also have a disability of some sort, whether that is an emotional disturbance, an intellectual disability, a learning disability, a physical disability. These are our students that cross those lines and really prove to us that gifted education is special education. These students, however, are the most likely to fall through the cracks because as we have that stereotypical thinking, right, of special education and gifted education,
These students are more likely to not receive services in one area or the other because once they are identified as either a gifted student or a student for special education, the diagnosis stops there. The identification stops there, which is really unfortunate because our twice exceptional students are exactly that. They are exceptional and to pigeonhole them into one area or the other instead of recognizing gifted education as special education.
means that these students need to start going unmet and that they're losing out on services that can really just put them up to the next level if we're fostering both their giftedness and taking care of their needs that may come with their disability. We'll get a little bit more into our twice exceptional student in a couple of slides, but these students are the most likely to fall through the cracks and why it is so important to recognize gifted education and special education as one in the same.
Our last profile of a gifted student is a type six, the autonomous. This student is going to very closely resemble that type one successful, right? This student is going to be academically gifted. They're going to behave well. They're going to enjoy school, but these students differ from a type one in the fact that instead of relying on the structure of the school system to validate them, they don't need you. They don't need me. They don't need the school. They have it.
all figured out on their own. These students are very self-reliant. They're very confident in their giftedness and in their sense of self, and they have figured out how to make the school system work for them. They set their own goals. They are their own leader, and they make sure their needs are met. Whereas a Type 1 may rely on a teacher or just the structure of a school day to feel comfortable and to feel validated, our Type 6s only need themselves, and they are very successful because of that.
because in the ways that type ones tend to not be able to have that self-confidence to pursue things, our type sixes are almost too confident in their abilities and that really sets them up well for the rest of their lives. You can almost think of a type one and a type six as two sides of the same coin. They're reaching the same end, but they have wildly different means to get there.
So these characteristics of our six profiles just go into a little bit more depth on what each profile is going to look like. It kind of gives you a more well-rounded view of each of the descriptions that we saw on the last couple of slides. But what I really want you to pay attention to here is how these characteristics of these profiles don't necessarily fit into the dictionary definition that the word used to label the profile.
may give you the impression of. So for example, in type one, right, we talked about how those students are very successful on the surface, but they may struggle when that support and that structure of the school day or the guidance of their teachers is taken away from them. So for example, our type ones are overachievers and they can be overly dependent on rules and structures and actually lose their creativity and their autonomy.
because they're people pleasers and they can actually really struggle when they get to college because elementary school or primary school, middle school, high school, those were all super easy for them, right? Because they knew that structure, they knew the expectations and they thrive in that situation. Whereas college is very more loosely structured. You do not necessarily have the same amount of hand holding that you might have in the younger grades. And so the type one successfuls, although they have
been very academically successful for their entire lives, they really struggle in the secondary education or in the workforce because they don't have that same level of comfort that they're used to in terms of the structures that they relied on. So really paying attention here in all of these bullets to how the word that is used to describe them is not necessarily how you describe them. If it's a little bit difficult to see on your screen, I'll just hit some of these points really quickly.
Our challenging students are at risk primarily for becoming that level four dropout. They have a high degree of creativity, but that often leads them to questioning authority and having them be identified with ODD, oppositional defiance disorder, when that may not necessarily actually be a diagnosis for them. The way that their giftedness manifests, and especially if it goes unidentified, can kind of blur those lines. So interactions at home and school involving conflict,
Class clowns, disruptions, those are all key identifiers of our type two challenging gifted students that may be misinterpreted as something else. Like we spoke on our underground students, this is more commonly females than it is males because they feel more of that pressure to conform and more of that insecurity because they are not intrinsic members of friend groups or popular clowns or cliques.
But any type of underground student is going to feel a lot of internal conflict to fit in that is contradicted by the way their giftedness makes them stand out. And then we talked about our dropouts in depth. These are just our students that either have gone too long being identified or they have not been identified at all, or they are a type 1 through 3 that has really struggled with their giftedness, leading to them dropping back and taking a step back from pursuing their giftedness.
These students may need a counselor or a trusted adult, their parents, a teacher, somebody in the school system, a coach even to help keep them on track with their giftedness so that they don't drop out and they don't fully pull away and in turn lose interest in school as a whole rather than just in pursuing their giftedness. Our twice exceptional students will primarily show up as a DNQ or does not qualify.
when they are tested one way or the other. So if a student has an obvious physical disability, for example, they may not even be considered for gifted services because there is kind of a one track mindset of giftedness and special education that people get stuck in. And so these students are often not qualified for the other service that they may be qualified for. These students have a few characteristics if they are gifted that might indicate
that they do have a disability that needs to be addressed with special education such as sloppy handwriting, low grades, poor test taking. But most importantly, these students can become very easily frustrated because they are repeatedly not listened to fully, right? Because if a student has obvious giftedness and they say, hey, I'm really bad at math. Well,
No, you can't be bad at math. You're so good at reading, you get such good grades, right? So these students are very easily frustrated because either their giftedness or their disability overshadows that twice exceptionality, and then they go without services. And then our last one, our autonomous gifted learners. These usually show at an early age. If a student is going to be autonomous at school, generally they're autonomous at home, right? So if you have a headstrong toddler,
you might be looking at a type six gifted learner. But these are often our leaders in the community. They're respected, they're liked. These students really seem to thrive on their own, but they do still need those supports that other gifted students need because their giftedness in being autonomous is something that needs to be fostered and supported. And they need to be given that freedom to explore.
their autonomy to make their own goals, to be their own leader. And if that's not something that's recognized in the student and they're missing out on those opportunities to foster their autonomy, the same kind of thing they can backslide into a type four. Any of our gifted learners can kind of slide into that dropout territory if their giftedness is not fostered and they are not adequately supported in the classroom and at home. And then moving on.
to that debunking. So really, this is where everything that we've talked about with those six profiles, I want you to kind of take and absorb and I want you to start shifting your mindset if you haven't already, I would hope you have by now. But if you have not started shifting that mindset between giftedness and special education, I want you to take a moment to do that now, right? Because we're moving into the territory of showing what giftedness is, debunking.
the misconceptions about it and then looking at it in that special education point of view. So giftedness, like we've said, is not necessarily always what you think. Although these students do have a ton of unique traits and there are no two students that are the same, even if they fall into the same profile of giftedness, they often struggle with something, anything behind that facade of what a gifted student is supposed to look like.
our gifted students of any profile often struggle with perfectionism, right? Especially our type ones and our type sixes, because if they're supposed to be this perfect model student and there are really high expectations placed on them because of their giftedness, they're going to internalize that. And they're going to start to struggle with perfectionism. And this can lead to, you know, them
pulling back and cracking under that pressure. And that's how we end up with students in type four. Those high standards that they are placed under, they often start placing on others. And that really impacts them negatively, social emotionally, because if they're facing these high standards and they're struggling with that and they turn around and they start placing those high standards on their peers, well, their peers are going to start struggling with that, especially if their peers are not gifted and they are not at the same standard.
or the same level that these standards were set on, they're going to alienate their peers, they're going to push their friends away. It's really going to impact them social emotionally in the long run for their well-being. And then we also kind of need to debunk that idea of success. Giftedness does not equal success. And conflating the two, especially for students that aren't gifted, has such a negative impact.
Think if you have a student that is gifted, right? And you say that because you are gifted, you are successful and they're not successful. Think about what that's going to do to them mentally, emotionally, academically, and then think of it in the reverse. If we have non gifted students and we say. You can only be successful if you are gifted. They're going to stop trying. They're going to be defeated from the start. They're not going to understand what you mean when you say gifted students.
are successful giftedness equals success. So really breaking down that mindset of what we think of giftedness as is such an important shift to make because giftedness is not success. Giftedness is not a compliment. Giftedness is a trait that a student has and is something that needs to be fostered. It's not a place similarly to how special education is not a place, right, in a school or in your life. It's an aspect of a student that needs to be recognized.
And it's something that goes above and beyond the standard expectation for school and curriculum. So it's something that needs to be recognized as special education. Just continuing to kind of debunk some myths here. Our first one is that gifted education is separate from special education. I've said it a hundred times already, I'm gonna say it again. They are two sides of the same coin. Giftedness and gifted education are a tenant of special education.
We also see the next one, gifted students don't have special needs or disabilities. While that may be true for some gifted students, we have our twice exceptional students who do make up a roughly two to five percent of the entire school age population and it is possible for gifted students to have special needs and disabilities. The myth that gifted students can't qualify for special education services again.
are twice exceptional students, they absolutely can and they should if they have a disability and have needs that need to be met. Our next one, academic giftedness is the only type of giftedness is simply not true. Well, academic giftedness is what you might think of if you are still in that one track mindset of what gifted education is. Surely, right? Academic giftedness is a type of giftedness, but it's not the only type of giftedness.
You can be gifted in sports, music, art. There are any number of things that students can be gifted in beyond just the standard doing well in school academically. The next one I really want to impart on you the importance of not discounting giftedness and the needs that come with that by saying a student is smart or quiet or well behaved, right? They'll be fine. They do so well.
This is exactly how our gifted students end up becoming type four dropouts. If you just assume that your gifted student is fine and that they'll be okay and they don't need my help, they do. And if you don't recognize that and you just assume that they're gonna be okay, this is where we start to see students fall through the cracks, regardless of how they present in class or at school. They're kids and there's something that they struggle with and their giftedness might just be that thing like in the case of our type threes.
If they're standing out and that makes them uncomfortable and they're struggling and you think that they're going to be just fine, they need support. And they need support in school, they need support at home, and that's really where we see giftedness overlap with special education. The next one is also very important to shift your mindset away from, is that student can't be gifted and talented. They're making poor grades, they misbehave, they have a disability.
It's not true. Any student can be gifted just the same way that any student can have a disability, Giftedness and disabilities don't discriminate. So just because a student is not presenting the way that you would expect a gifted student to present doesn't mean that they're not gifted and doesn't mean that they can't qualify for gifted services. And then the final one, although it seems pure of intention,
All students are gifted in some way, gifted education doesn't need to be specialized. While we do recognize that all of our students have unique skills and attributes that make them who they are, and a lot of these are positive, not all students are gifted, if you're thinking of it in terms of gifted education and special education. And categorizing all students and discounting students giftedness by saying everyone is gifted or everyone is special really
takes away from those distinct independent needs that our gifted students have and makes them less likely to get the services that they need. So I'm gonna go ahead and kick this over to Taylor. I'm sure I have talked long enough for you, but Taylor's gonna kind of walk us through in her experience and in her expertise where she has seen giftedness and special education overlap and how even though there are some things that seem like differences between gifted education and special education,
they're really similarities that are just handled in different ways. So Taylor, I'll let you take this one. Perfect. Thanks, Crystal. So in gifted education and special education, there are more commonalities than you may believe. Both of these educational models set additional goals for students, goals that are above and beyond the scope of a general education placement.
of the coin require specialized assessments to determine eligibility, whether it be IQ test, a battery of educational assessments, both of them in order to identify a child as gifted or as special needs or needing an IEP or 504, they are provided with the opportunity to get evaluations and independent testing completed if needed. In special education,
It's generally more so providing accommodations in the form of an IEP or 504 to support students with a specific disability. IEPs are typically based on several different categories that a student must meet to qualify for an IEP. 504s are used more so for medical accommodations during the school day. Overall, both gifted education and special education require
personalized approaches for students. Just as students with disabilities need IEPs and 504s, gifted students need customized learning plans to stay engaged. Gifted students typically do well with project-based or problem-based learning that allow them to be creative. And like I'd mentioned previously, I really want to hone in on this. Schools often fail.
to identify 2E, twice exceptional students, because they primarily only focus on the disability or only on the giftedness, not one or the other. Some clinical themes in gifted education are diagnostic oversight. Many students are overlooked because they aren't great at compensating for their struggles, right? Schools have to be able to balance academic rigor as well as
learning accommodations to fully educate the whole child.
Absolutely, and that's why it's so important for our next step, the development step for you to understand what you can do for your students. So just understanding what giftedness is or isn't and shifting that mindset is not enough. What's really important is to understand what you can do for them. And the first step is understanding who your gifted student is, right? So if you see on our right here, we have a chart that indicates that
59 % of students go unidentified. And that's one way or the other, right? That's not just for giftedness or just for disability. 59 % of students aren't identified for special education or for giftedness combined. And that number only starts to go down as we start to get more specific. So only 20 % of R2E students are identified. And remember, roughly 2 to 5 % of all school-aged children are R2E. So if we're only hitting 20 % of that
very large number in the scale of things. It's a very small percentage of students who are identified and receiving services for 2E. Going down one more step, only 15 % of our students with disabilities are identified and only 6 % of our gifted students are identified. So the
The really important thing that you can do to help your student is to understand the referral process, whether that's referral for giftedness or referral for special education or a referral for both if you think your student is 2E. Each district, each state, each town even might have a different referral process. So definitely reach out to your district or your school to see what that process might be. But generally speaking, the process has very similar steps regardless of where you are.
There's usually going to be a specific referral period and a specific testing window. That test, depending on what you're seeking, may be a group test for giftedness with certain nationally recognized tests that provide a numerical score for giftedness or for a specific disability. If there's a physical disability, that might involve a physical test, or if you think a learning disability in dyslexia might be a reading test. So the test may vary, but there should be a test.
and a testing window. A referral is going to be needed, but that referral can come from anywhere. It can come from you, it can come from a teacher, it can come from an administrator, a parent, a principal, it can even come from a doctor. So once you have that referral, the referral process generally starts at age six, but especially for our autonomous kiddos, right, that are gonna start showing signs early, it's never too early to start looking for that and to collect evidence and to just get some advice.
on if your student needs to be referred. So don't be afraid to look into that process before age six. Schools just typically don't start the referral process until age six. And then keep in mind too that your student can be gifted in one or more areas. They can have a disability in one or more areas or they can be twice exceptional in one or more areas. There is no one thing that your student can be referred for and then that's it. As many things as they need services for, you can get services for them.
and understanding the referral process and where to go from that initial observation of giftedness or disability or twice exceptionality. That's what's really important. Another thing that you can do to support your student is to understand and use gifted education resources. Some of the clinical themes in gifted education are perfectionism and imposter syndrome. Gifted students a lot of times place unrealistic expectations on themselves.
A lot of times they think that their expectations of others, but they're really guided by how they feel about themselves and what's going on in their own mind. That is a telltale sign. know, so talk to your children, see where they stand, see what their expectations are. One thing that I used to do in my classroom when I was a gifted teacher, just to analyze and evaluate where they were, we used to do vision board sessions.
And I would see that they had very, very high expectations for themselves and their lives. So just as a family, you could do something like that with your children and talk about the need for realistic expectations and being able to have achievable goals that are not overwhelming. Okay. Another thing is there's a lot of burnout related to this, as well as mental health risks, high achieving students, gifted students,
they internalize stress. This leads to chronic anxiety and exhaustion, inability to truly focus and burnout. One last thing is there's a lot of social emotional gaps. Gifted students kind of typically feel emotionally disconnected from their peers. You'll notice that gifted students bond better with adults and speak like adults. So
And that's because they are feeling miles above their peers. So maybe talking with your child and giving them some social strategies could be something that would help them in the classroom environment. So to close, I just want to empower you to know your rights as a parent, right? Know what the educational laws are.
know what the policies are that relate to gifted education. Look at your state procedural safeguards. Look at your district gifted policies. Look at the different programs that they offer. These education laws vary by state. So you can really get more information by looking at the district level. Push for assessments. Advocate for your child.
If a child is underperforming, despite you knowing that they have advanced thinking skills, request testing. Seek differentiation for your student. Gifted students benefit from enrichment programs, project-based learning, mentorship opportunities, anything that really gets their mind going. Advocate for dual support for your child. 2E students need accommodations, but they also need challenges. So keep that in mind.
when offering strategies and solutions for your child. You know your child better than any IEP team or LEA. So go with your gut, talk to your child and you know, a lot of times the students will say, well, how was school? it was boring. Okay. We got those dry answers. So try to pull it out of them, right? And get, find why it was boring. Well, was it boring because
you learned something different today than you learned something that you already know today and that was what you were doing in class. Is that why you were bored or is there another reason why you were bored? Just using those thinking patterns and bringing that out really helps students identify how they feel. So with that being said, thank you so much for attending.
That wraps up today's episode of the Legally Blank Justice podcast. We've covered the importance of advocating for gifted students, understanding their legal rights and ensuring they receive the education they deserve. A big thanks to Dr. Taylor Ruiz and Crystal Lash for sharing their expertise on how gifted education intersects with special education and why early identification, proper accommodations and strong advocacy are crucial.
If you have questions about education law, special education rights, or need legal support for your child's educational needs, visit us at www.kaltmanlaw.com or give us a call at 516-788-5534. Our team at K. Altman Law is here to help you navigate the system and fight for the best possible outcome for your child. Thanks for tuning in.
Don't forget to subscribe, share and leave a review if you found this episode helpful. And until next time, stay informed, stay empowered and keep advocating for what's right. See you next time on the Legally Blonde Justice Club.
 

The Impact of AI on Academic Integrity: Challenges and Controversies: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 35

Summary:
In this episode of the Legally Blind Justice Podcast, host Tim Markley discusses the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in education and its implications for academic integrity. AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other natural language processing models, are becoming widely used by K-12 and higher education students for tasks such as essay drafting, summarizing readings, paraphrasing text, conducting research, and tutoring support. These AI-driven applications enhance learning efficiency and provide personalized study assistance, allowing students to access and understand complex information more easily.
However, the widespread use of AI in academia has sparked ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding plagiarism, academic dishonesty, and fair use. Universities and educational institutions have responded by implementing AI detection tools, including Turnitin and Grammarly’s AI Checker, to identify AI-generated work. Despite their intent to uphold academic standards, these tools are not always accurate, sometimes leading to false accusations of misconduct.
As AI continues to evolve, the debate over its appropriate and ethical use in education remains ongoing. Schools and universities must navigate the balance between leveraging AI as a learning tool and preventing academic misconduct, ensuring that students develop genuine critical thinking and writing skills while using technology responsibly.
 
www.kaltmanlaw.com 

: Exploring the Complexities of Title IX with Keith Altman: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast Episode 34

Episode Description:Welcome to Legally Blind Justice, the podcast where we dive deep into legal issues impacting education. In this episode, we explore the evolving landscape of Title IX with Keith Altman, founder of K. Altman Law and a seasoned litigator in education law. Join us as Keith discusses the foundations of Title IX, the challenges schools face in compliance, and the critical legal safeguards for those involved in these cases. Whether you're a student, educator, or legal professional, this episode provides valuable insights into navigating Title IX matters. Stay tuned for an engaging Q&A session where Keith addresses complex scenarios and shares his expertise on defending educational rights.
www.kaltmanlaw.com
Transcript Summary:
Summary of the Podcast from a podcast/webinar featuring Keith Altman, a legal expert specializing in education law, particularly Title IX issues. Key topics covered include:
Title IX Overview:
Title IX, established in 1972, prohibits gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment in educational institutions receiving federal funding.
It protects against both institutional discrimination and sexual harassment/assault between individuals in schools.
Key Changes and Challenges:
Upcoming regulatory changes in 2024 were revoked by the Biden administration, preventing significant erosion of procedural safeguards for the accused.
Gender identity issues in athletics and their impact on female participation and scholarships were discussed critically.
Processes and Protections:
Title IX requires schools to have policies to handle discrimination and harassment. Schools must investigate allegations and offer fair procedures, including hearings and appeals.
K-12 and higher education differ in their procedural requirements, with K-12 typically avoiding live hearings.
Investigations must be impartial, thorough, and conducted by trained personnel.
Consent and Standards:
Key legal standards include "severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive" for harassment and clear consent in cases involving physical contact.
The burden of proof in Title IX is typically a "preponderance of evidence," lower than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard in criminal cases.
Legal Remedies and Concerns:
Violations can lead to federal lawsuits with potential damages.
Procedural missteps by schools in handling Title IX cases can result in lawsuits for violations of respondents' rights.
Special Cases:
Challenges include dealing with incidents involving minors, disabilities, and overlapping criminal proceedings.
Faculty and staff are subject to different rules, including prohibitions on informal resolutions.
Expert Insights:
Keith Altman emphasized the importance of legal representation in Title IX cases, given the significant consequences for respondents.
He highlighted systemic issues, including untrained personnel and unequal protections, and provided practical strategies for defending cases.
The session concluded with questions on how Title IX applies in workplace-like scenarios and the anticipated impact of administrative changes. The podcast encouraged individuals facing Title IX issues to seek professional legal support.
 

Top Five Mistakes When Dealing With Academic Misconduct: Legally Blind Justice Podcast Episode 33

Podcast Description: Legally Blind Justice – Tackling Academic Misconduct
Welcome to Legally Blind Justice, the podcast where we confront the toughest challenges facing students in their academic journey. Hosted by Tim Markley, Senior Director for Student Defense at K. Altman Law, this show provides essential insights and practical advice for navigating accusations of academic misconduct.
In today’s episode, we discuss academic misconduct: what it is, how accusations arise, and the top five mistakes students make when facing these allegations. Whether it’s plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, or self-citation issues, we guide you step-by-step through the process and offer strategies to protect your academic future.
Learn how to avoid common errors like overreacting, prematurely admitting guilt, ignoring university procedures, or attempting to face accusations alone. Discover how preparation, understanding your institution’s policies, and seeking the right support can make all the difference.
Tune in to hear real-life stories, actionable tips, and lessons that will empower you to handle academic misconduct accusations with confidence and integrity.
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Success is determined on a case-by-case basis, and there is no representation that the services provided by K. Altman Law are superior to those of other attorneys.
Subscribe, share, and leave a review to help more students navigate these critical challenges! For additional resources, visit us at www.kaltmanlaw.com.
 
Show Transcript: This is an auto generated transcript and may contain errors.
This podcast is for information only and should not be considered legal advice. There is no representation that the legal services to be performed by LOCA are better than the services of other attorneys. There is no guarantee of the outcome. Success is rendered on a case-by-case basis. Welcome to the Legally Blind Justice podcast, the podcast where we tackle the toughest challenges facing students in their academic journey.
Today's episode is all about academic misconduct. What it is, how accusations arise, and, more importantly, what I consider the top five errors that students make when accused. I'm your host, Tim Markley, and I serve as the Senior Director for Student Defense at K. Altman Law. So whether it's a misunderstanding, an honest mistake, or a deliberate act, being accused of academic misconduct
can be overwhelming. But there's good news. With the right approach, you can navigate the process effectively. So we're going to break it down step by step so you'll be prepared if this ever happens to you. So stick around. This is an episode you don't want to miss. So, let's start with this. What is academic misconduct? On the surface, it might seem obvious. Cheating, plagiarism, like things like that. But in reality, it's much broader and includes a lot of gray area.
that students don't often think about. So the most common examples of academic misconduct include plagiarism, copying or paraphrasing someone else's work without proper attribution. That includes plagiarizing yourself by using older papers that you've done in a different class. It's cheating using unauthorized materials to collaborate on assignments meant to be done individually.
falsifying data, sources, or even research. And then facilitation, helping others commit misconduct, such as sharing completed assignments or old tests. And finally, contract cheating, paying or coercing someone to do your work for you. Now, beyond these, there are less obvious forms, like reusing your own work, which I mentioned above, such as self-plagiarism. Now I once knew a student who got flagged
for plagiarism because they included a sentence from a draft of their final essay, but they forgot to cite the original draft. They didn't even realize that self citation could be an issue. Now, this is something we see a lot with freshmen, first time college students and foreign students who are coming here from a different university system that has different citation rules. That's why it's important to understand your institution's
academic integrity policy because every school handles and defines it differently. Now, some schools have zero-tolerance policies, meaning even minor infractions can lead to suspension. Other schools are more lenient. They have a kind of first-strike policy with just a warning. So take the time to read those school policies at the beginning of every semester or if you're transferring schools
when you move to that new school. Knowing the rules can save you from unnecessary trouble. Now, you can typically find these rules in your student handbook or on the school's website. And this is all critical because there's an emotional impact to being accused of academic misconduct. Imagine you're in the middle of finals week, juggling multiple deadlines.
 
and you get an email from your professor about academic integrity saying that you've been accused of misconduct. Now, what's your first reaction? For most students, it's panic. You might be shocked, embarrassed, or even angry. And these emotions are completely normal, but they can cloud your judgment if you're not careful. I had a client once who told me about getting an accusation for copying answers during a lab exam.
Now in reality, they'd simply glance at a neighbor's screen to double check the time left on the exam. But their initial reaction was to fire off an angry email accusing the professor of targeting them. That only made the situation worse. The key here is to stay calm. Take a moment to process what's happening. And remember, an accusation is not a conviction. It's the start of a process. And how you respond
will impact the outcome. Before doing anything, give yourself 24 hours to process the situation. Talk to someone you trust. It could be a friend, family member, academic advisor, or you even might reach out to an educational attorney. So let's move on and let's look at these top five errors that I think students make. Error number one.
panicking or overreacting. The first mistake you make is letting your emotions drive your actions. It's easy to feel defensive or outraged, but impulsive responses like sending angry emails, confronting the professor, or posting nasty stuff on social media can and will backfire on you. I worked with a student once who did exactly that after being accused of cheating.
went on a tirade on social media about how unfair the whole process was. Now, this post made it back to the academic integrity folks and it was used as evidence against them in their hearing. So remember, anything you say or do can be used to assess your character. So keep your communications professional and focused on resolving the issues. The second mistake I see students make.
admitting a guilt without understanding the accusations. This confessing prematurely can get you into trouble. Some students think that admitting guilt, whether guilty or not, will lead to a lighter punishment, get the matter over with, and they can move on, especially if they know that the school has a two-strike or three-strike policy as it relates to academic misconduct. Now, in reality,
This often limits your ability to defend yourself later. A student accused of plagiarism confesses because they didn't know how to properly cite a source. Now, later they realized the citation error was minor and it would have constituted plagiarism under their school's policy. Now, before admitting anything about those details, they should have looked at the policy
talk to someone and maybe we could have corrected that before they were actually charged with plagiarism and it ended up on their record. Now, that's not to say that sometimes admitting your mistake is the best policy, but don't do it immediately. Think about the rules, the consequences, and what you actually did. Review the evidence, and if it doesn't make sense, let's get some clarification before we roll into a meeting that will get you suspended.
put on probation or gets permanently placed on your record. Error number three, ignoring university procedures. Every school has a formal procedure for handling academic misconduct and ignoring results that can result in a direct guilty verdict. I've seen this happen with multiple students. They ignore a notice to meet with a professor. They ignore a notice about a hearing.
 
And when they don't show up, they're automatically found guilty because they failed to attend the hearing. Simply ignoring it won't make it go away. You've got to read all the correspondence carefully. You've got to make sure you know the deadlines. Show up for meetings and hearings. If you're unsure about the process, consult an advisor, legal counsel,
someone else. There are things like a five-day rule that can get you into trouble. Is it five business days or five calendar days that an appeal might be due? All of those things are important, so you've got to make sure you read those rules. Error number four. Going it alone. A fourth mistake is thinking that you have to handle everything yourself. Academic misconduct is complex and
You need support. Like I said, it can be an advisor, a parent, or a legal expert. They can make a difference because oftentimes, they're not as emotionally involved as you are, and they can see the big picture. They're not blinded by the emotion of the situation. So, a student accused of plagiarism that I worked with had a campus advocate who helped them demonstrate that their so-called plagiarism was actually a citation error.
They avoided penalties thanks to that guidance. Most schools allow you to bring a support person to a hearing. Don't hesitate to use this option. Even if the support person can't speak at that hearing on your behalf, can oftentimes they're there to provide moral support. And if you need to, you can ask for a break to have an outside conversation with that advisor. Now, error five, focusing only on the punishment.
don't fixate on the potential consequences. While it's natural to worry about punishment, this mindset prevents you from preparing a strong defense. I know of students who spent hours pleading for leniency instead of gathering evidence to show that their actions weren't intentional. As a result, they go into the hearing, they're talking about leniency, and the committee automatically assumes if you're asking for leniency, you gotta be guilty.
and they end up with the negative consequences. Instead, focus on presenting your side of the story. Gather evidence, drafts of your work, emails, assignments, instructions, anything to provide context for that argument that you were not guilty of this academic misconduct. So those are the five steps that I see folks make. Let's look at some things you can do to protect yourself and prevent that misconduct. Number one, as I've said this a hundred times,
Understand the rules. Read your school's academic integrity policy, and if you're unsure about assignments or guidelines, ask a professor. I recommend you use the same tools that the professors use when they're looking at your papers. Programs like Turn It In or Grammarly will tell you if your paper looks too much like an AI paper or too much of it looks to be plagiarized. So if you
Do those things ahead of time. That is a significant way to improve the quality of your paper and to improve the chances that you don't get accused of academic integrity. Communicate, communicate, communicate. If you're struggling, don't hesitate to reach out to your professor or an academic advisor. They are there to help you. Now, I will tell you to save those communications.
They may be helpful if you are eventually accused of some kind of academic misconduct. Manage your time. Procrastination leads to poor decisions like cutting corners or rushing through assignments. And this is especially true for college freshmen. There's a real feeling sometimes when you're a freshman, you're on your own for the first time, and you think, I can stay up all night, and I'll cram that paper out just before it's due.
and you find yourself cutting corners. Don't do that. Learn good study habits. That'll serve you all the way through college. So let's look at some of the lessons and things that we've learned here. Be prepared, read the rules, seek help. Now there are lots of stories about students accused of academic misconduct that I've been able to in my role to help students with.
I once had a student accused of cheating during an online exam who proved their innocence by being able to show their browser logs and showing that they didn't have unauthorized resources or didn't access other things. I had another student who admitted to a citation mistake but was able to work with the professor to fix that issue and to deal with the concerns. And instead of being cited for plagiarism,
He and the professor worked it out to teach how to do a proper citation. Now, those are just a couple of stories about what's happened and how to respond to accusations. So remember, academic misconduct can be daunting, but they don't have to derail your academic journey. Avoid the mistakes we discussed and follow the proactive steps so you can handle these situations with confidence and integrity.
There are a host of resources as well to help you. Your school has an academic integrity office and a website with all kinds of materials. There are academic advisors and campus advocates. There's legal aid if you need it to help you with these things. And remember, the university has a whole legal department to write up these rules and help them interpret these rules. And if they don't have an in-house legal department, they have an outside counsel who fills that role. So...
you need someone on your side. That could be an attorney, a parent, or someone trusted. But remember, get help, don't go it alone. So if you found this episode helpful, share it with your classmates, subscribe, leave us a review. You can also check us out on the web at khaltmanlaw.com.
 

Navigating University Disciplinary Hearings: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 32

Navigating University Disciplinary Hearings
 
Keywords: university disciplinary hearings, student rights, due process, academic misconduct, Title IX, appeal process, legal advice, student defense
Summary: In this episode of the Legally Blind Justice Podcast, Dr. Tim Markley discusses the complexities of university disciplinary hearings, including preparation, understanding the conduct board, ensuring fairness and due process, and the appeal process. He emphasizes the importance of being well-prepared and knowing your rights as a student facing allegations of misconduct.
Takeaways:
Disciplinary hearings can be overwhelming, but they don't have to be.
Preparation is critical for a favorable outcome.
Understand the charges and review the specific policies you're accused of violating.
Gather evidence and prepare your statement for the hearing.
Dress appropriately and stay composed during the hearing.
Due process means your hearing should be fair and transparent.
If the decision doesn't go your way, don't lose hope; appeals are possible.
Review your school's policy for filing an appeal and meet deadlines.
Stick to the facts in your appeal letter; avoid negativity.
Universities have legal departments; you should have support too.
Sound Bites:
"Bring in an advisor for support and guidance."
"You have the right to due process."
 
 
Transcript:
Tim Markley (00:00.046)
This podcast is for information only and should not be considered legal advice. There is no representation that the legal services to be performed by LOCA are better than the services of other attorneys. There is no guarantee of the outcome. Success is rendered on a case-by-case basis. Hello and welcome to the Legally Blind Justice Podcast, where we tackle legal and disciplinary challenges that face college students and K-12 students.
and we show you how to navigate them with confidence. I'm your host, Dr. Tim Markley, and today we're diving into an important topic, university disciplinary hearings. Whether it's an allegation of academic misconduct, a Title IX violation, or some other serious issue, disciplinary hearings can be overwhelming, but they don't have to be. With preparation and understanding of the process and the rules, you can face that panel with
clarity and confidence. So in this episode, we're going to cover the following topics. What happens in the university conduct hearing? How to prepare effectively? How fairness and due process are built into the system and what to do when they're not. And finally, we'll talk about a decision if it's not in your favor and the importance of appealing those decisions. So stick with me as we break down these processes, share insights for some real college policies.
and show you where to find the help you need. And remember, you can always visit our website at kaltmanlaw.com or call us at 1-855-K-ALTMAN. Let's jump in. Let's start with the basics. So what is a university conduct board? These panels are put together by universities or colleges when a student is accused of some kind of offense.
It is typically composed of faculty and administrators, deans, department chairs, and sometimes include students. In some rare cases, it may be a student only panel. Or if it's a Title IX hearing, they may actually hire someone from the outside to serve on that panel. So here's a breakdown of what you can expect. A notification of charges.
Tim Markley (02:19.68)
Most universities, like the University of California, require students receive written notice of charges at least 10 business days before the hearing. This allows you time to prepare for your defense. Not all schools, though, are as specific as the University of California, and it may actually take longer and sometimes even shorter. Now, the hearing itself. At schools like Michigan State,
you'll have the opportunity to present evidence, call witnesses, and respond to questions. In most cases, you're allowed an advisor, but in nearly every instance, the advisor is not allowed to speak on your behalf. The exception here is a Title IX hearing. In a Title IX hearing, your advisor will actually be the one that questions the complainant, the respondent, and any witnesses.
So that's a major difference in a Title IX case. Now, these are adjudicated on a very different standard than most legal proceedings. If you watch TV shows like Law and Order or Perry Mason, beyond a reasonable doubt, it's the standard. But most universities use a standard called preponderance of the evidence. This means that they determine whether it's more likely than not
that the alleged violation occurred. That's all it takes to be found responsible in these hearings. So it's important to treat these hearings seriously. Even though they're not criminal trials, they can have a significant consequence. It can lead to suspension, probation, expulsion, a permanent mark on your academic record. So you've been charged with this violation.
What do you do? Let's talk about preparing for the hearing. Preparation is critical. A well-prepared student has a much stronger chance of a favorable outcome. First and foremost, understand the charges. Review the specific policies you're accused of violating. For example, the University of Texas Student Code of Conduct outlines academic dishonesty, and it includes unauthorized collaboration.
Tim Markley (04:41.698)
submitting the same work in multiple classes without approval or falsifying data. So you've got to look at what you're being charged with, know the exact violation, because that will guide your defense. Second, review the evidence. Request evidence is going to be used against you. Many schools like Penn State provide access to this information before the hearing.
But it's your responsibility to ask for it. They are not simply going to send it to you. Gather other evidence, emails, text messages, class notes, testimony from witnesses. For example, if you're accused of plagiarism, your drafts with time stamps can be a crucial defense. Prepare your statement. Write a clear, concise explanation of your perspective.
Practice speaking confidently so you're ready to answer questions from the panel. And don't take this as an opportunity to get back at a university administrator you think has done you wrong. They want you to be professional. They want you focused on the academic chart, what you're being charged with. This is not a chance to get your pound to flesh. Five, bring in the advisor. Most schools allow advisors.
like a lawyer, a professor, or someone else to be present during that hearing. While they may not speak for you, they can provide critical support and guidance. And most hearings will allow you to stop and have a conversation with your advisor before answering questions or moving forward. We always recommend an attorney or a professional who does this kind of work. But having someone there with you can
provides you with great support. It can calm you down and provide you someone to have a conversation with if you're confused by what's going on. So for an example, imagine being accused of disruptive behavior during a dorm event. If you have text messages from the event organizer thanking for you and your participation, those messages can serve as evidence that challenge the claim against you. So preparation is about more than evidence though. It's also about presentation.
Tim Markley (07:07.63)
dress appropriately, be respectful, and stay composed. Next, fairness and due process. A common question that students ask is, will I be treated fairly? And that answer lies in what's called due process. Due process means that your hearing should be fair and transparent, and that it's going to follow those rules that are established in the school's code of conduct. So due process typically starts with
One, notification of charges. Schools like Stanford require students receive written notification of the charges and include the evidence against them. Two, the right to be heard. a university, students are guaranteed the right to resent evidence and witnesses, ensuring that they have a fair chance to defend themselves. The third part of due process is decision making, and it needs to be impartial.
The University of Illinois, for example, requires that all panel members disclose any conflicts of interest to avoid bias. And unfortunately, some schools, though, do fall short of the standard. So, for example, if a university denies you access to the evidence until the day of the hearing, that's a procedural violation and becomes grounds for appeal that we'll talk a little bit about in a moment. If you believe your rights have been compromised,
Don't hesitate to bring this up with your advisor or to file a formal complaint with the university. Next, filing an appeal. If the decision doesn't go your way, don't lose hope. Most universities allow you to file an appeal, but timing on appeals is often critical. And I will tell you, we have had clients where they lost their first round, but in the next level of appeal, they were successful.
I even had one place where we had to go through four levels of appeals. It started with a professor. It went to the department and then went to the College of Education to the provost and finally all the way up to a state review board for that client before it was finally overturned. Now, appeals typically fall into four areas, procedural errors that affected the outcome. So.
Tim Markley (09:30.754)
You weren't allowed to see the evidence. That's a procedural area. New evidence that wasn't available during the hearing. Maybe one of the witnesses that you wanted to call was out of the country and came back into the country after the hearing. The sanctions are disproportionately harsh. You're a freshman student and you accidentally plagiarized something or failed to cite properly and were charged with plagiarism. And then you were dismissed. That's an excessive sanction.
for a relatively minor violation. Number four, the evidence of bias or misconduct by a panel member. So when you're doing this and you find out that one of the panel members is best friends with a professor who is accusing you of cheating, there may be some bias there. You may have a basis to appeal because of that. So how to file an appeal? Review your school's policy. For instance,
Syracuse University requires appeals to be filed within seven days of the decision. I've seen other schools where that review period is as short as three days. Some have a 10 day appeal. You also have to understand, is it calendar days or business days? How does spring break, Christmas break, Thanksgiving break impact the counting of those days to be appealed? Write a strong letter of appeal. Be specific about
why you believe the decision was flawed. Reference back to those reasons for appeal that are outlined in the school's policies. For example, if you weren't allowed to present a key witness, explain how this affected the outcome. Don't get mad, negative, and judgmental in this letter of appeal. Stick to the facts. Stick to the errors in procedure. Next, submit
Follow up, make sure to meet the deadlines, confirm that your appeal has been received. So that's the hearing process kind of in a nutshell. But let's let's wrap up and review one more time. So quick recap. Treat disciplinary hearings seriously. Prepare thoroughly. Understand your rights under the university policies. If something feels unfair, speak up. You have the right to due process.
Tim Markley (11:57.098)
Appeals can be a powerful tool to overcome that first hearing. Have an advisor with you to help you guide you through the process. I cannot stress this enough. For more information, check your university student code of conduct or contact your school's legal aid office. Nearly every university has that office. Additionally, you might want to get personalized guidance.
visit someone else outside of the university. Check out our website at K. Altman Law. We have a lot of resources that can help you in matters such as this. Or give us a call at 1-855-K-Altman. We specialize in helping students navigate complex disciplinary matters and protecting your rights. I want to remind you universities have entire legal departments
or access to outside counsel to help them navigate their own rules and processes. And you should have someone helping you do that as well. So I want to thank you for listening to the Legally Blind Justice podcast. If you found this episode helpful, subscribe, share it with a friend, leave us a review. Next time, we'll dive into another topic about student defense, navigating academic integrity violations, K-12 issues, or special ed issues. Until then, stay informed, stay strong, and remember, you're not alone.
 
 

Navigating Transition Planning for Students with Disabilities: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 31

This episode of the Legally Blind Justice podcast features a webinar replay focused on transition planning for students with disabilities. The discussion emphasizes the importance of creating effective transition plans as students move from high school to adulthood, covering legal frameworks, key elements, measurable goals, and the roles of parents and students in the process. The speakers provide insights into the challenges faced in transition planning and offer practical examples and resources to support families in navigating this critical phase of education.
 
takeaways
Transition planning is essential for students with disabilities.
IEP transition plans should start by age 16 or earlier.
Parents should actively participate in IEP meetings.
Transition assessments help identify student needs and goals.
SMART goals are crucial for effective transition planning.
Community resources play a vital role in successful transitions.
Students should be involved in their own transition planning.
Guardianship considerations are essential as students approach adulthood.
Collaboration among parents, students, and schools is critical.
Transition plans must be individualized to meet each child's needs.
keywords: transition planning, special education, IEP, guardianship, post-secondary education, vocational rehabilitation, student advocacy, legal framework, measurable goals, community resources
www.kaltmanlaw.com
 

Understanding Student Rights Through Landmark Cases: The Legally Blind Justice Podcast: Episode 30

This episode of the Legally Blind Justice Podcast explores the evolution of student rights through landmark legal cases. Host Dr. Tim Markley discusses significant rulings that have shaped due process, Title IX, and the protections afforded to students in educational settings. The conversation highlights key cases from the 1960s to 2019, illustrating the ongoing development of legal standards that protect students from discrimination, harassment, and unfair disciplinary actions.
takeaways
Students have a right to due process before expulsion.
The Tinker case established free speech rights for students.
Public universities cannot discriminate against student groups based on beliefs.
Suspensions require an opportunity for students to present their side.
Title IX protects against sex discrimination in education.
Academic dismissals have different procedural protections than disciplinary actions.
Schools can be held liable for deliberate indifference to harassment.
Peer-to-peer harassment is covered under Title IX.
Mental health issues do not negate a student's due process rights.
Title IX investigations must be conducted fairly and without bias.
keywords: student rights, due process, Title IX, education law, legal cases, student defense, school discipline, harassment, academic dismissal, legal advice